Skip to content Skip to content

Site Report: Fort Wainwright (OU-3) FE Pipeline MP2.7/3.0 FTWW-084

Site Name: Fort Wainwright (OU-3) FE Pipeline MP2.7/3.0 FTWW-084
Address: Mileposts 2.7 and 3.0, Fort Wainwright, AK 99703
File Number: 108.38.002.02
Hazard ID: 1673
Status: Active
Staff: Tim Sharp, 9074512131 tim.sharp@alaska.gov
Latitude: 64.857195
Longitude: -147.578279
Horizontal Datum:WGS84

We make every effort to ensure the data presented here is accurate based on the best available information currently on file with DEC. It is therefore subject to change as new information becomes available. We recommend contacting the assigned project staff prior to making decisions based on this information.

Problems/Comments

The Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline (FEP) consists of two source areas: Milepost (MP) 2.7 and MP 3.0 which are located within the East Birch Hill Tank Farm (EBHTF) area in the northern part of the main cantonment of Fort Wainwright, Alaska. The EBHTF was constructed in 1940 and includes, three truck fill stands and unloading ramps, nine main valve pits, several water separator pits, and over 30 concrete valve pits located at each underground storage tank (UST) location. A 1989 soil gas survey analyses along the FEP identified elevated levels of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) in the milepost areas. Additional investigations detected petroleum hydrocarbons (gasoline products and additives) in the surface and subsurface soil and groundwater. Contamination likely resulted from years of pipe leakage and spills from the FEP. Due to the low-permeability of the soils and permafrost being present, the remedy selected in the Record of Decision (ROD) was not going to be effective. An Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) was signed in 2002 to allow for soil excavations and ex-situ treatments. Approximately 6,000 cubic yards of soil was removed from the site and treated in soil treatment cells. Additional monitoring wells were to be installed for site characterization purposes, and monitoring of the groundwater was to continue until the remedial action objectives (RAOs) were achieved. Excavation and ex-situ treatment of the soil resulted in a reduction of contaminant concentrations in the groundwater. Additional soil borings and monitoring wells were installed to provide more information on the geology and permafrost of the area. Currently, monitoring wells at the MP2.7 and 3.0 sites are sampled once every five years, before the Five-Year Review. The corresponding Army HQAES site number is: 02871.1061.

Action Information

Action Date Action Description DEC Staff
3/26/1996 Record of Decision Active remedial action agreed to at all three sites. Rielle Markey
11/8/1996 Update or Other Action (Old R:Base Action Code = SI - Site Investigation). Previous sampling detected 7,200 ug/L benzene, 330 ug/L ethylbenzene, and 1,200 ug/L xylenes in groundwater; 140 mg/kg benzene in soil. The action date used is the date of the Army Defense Site Environmental Restoration Tracking System Worksheet, which contained the concentration information. Former Staff
2/28/1997 Site Added to Database Site added by Shannon and Wilson. S&W
1/3/2001 Update or Other Action The soils at both of the sites have been excavated and stockpiled at the Birch Hill Tank Farm. Treatment cells have been constructed to use AS/SVE technology to treat the soils ex-situ. The groundwater at the sites is still impacted and will be treated via monitored natural attenuation. There is also some remaining impacted soil at Milepost 2.7 that may be excavated in 2001 and added to the existing treatment cell. Ann Farris
1/25/2001 Update or Other Action Meeting with Army and EPA on January 24 indicates the ESD for OU3 is not completed yet. Still at issue is the CAMU for the milepost soils. EPA considers that these soils RCRA-waste because two TCLP analyses were above reg. limits. Ann Farris
5/11/2001 Meeting or Teleconference Held PM and Section Manager met with the Army RPM, Army attornies, and State AG to discuss RCRA issue. State agreed with the Army that the soils are not RCRA due to the source most likely being USTs. Army is drafting letter summarizing position that Army and possibly EPA CERCLA Project Manager will sign to be sent to EPA attorneys. Ann Farris
8/2/2001 Update or Other Action Received another draft version of ESD from the Army. It attempts to explain that the soils from these mileposts were actually contaminated from the UST tank farm on Birch Hill. Ann Farris
9/11/2001 Meeting or Teleconference Held FFA meeting in Seattle to discuss groundwater monitoring update, product recovery system status, ESD status, and trmt system status. 2000 Monitoring report summarizes monitoring results. ESD is not moving along. Army agreed to generate a document that will include all of their evidence that the MP soils were contaminated from a UST system. This document will be submitted to EPA for a final ruling on the UST exemption from RCRA. Ann Farris
12/12/2001 Institutional Control Record Established 1. All organizations conducting activities on United States Army Alaska (USARAK) controlled land are responsible for complying with established institutional controls (ICs). ICs are administrative, procedural, and regulatory measures to control human access to and usage of property. They are applicable to all known or suspected contaminated sites where contamination has been left in place. 2. These controls have been established to implement the selected remedial actions agreed upon by the U.S. Army (Army), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendment Reauthorization Act (SARA). These controls also apply to remedial actions agreed upon under Two-Party Compliance Agreements. These agreements are concluded between USARAK and ADEC and apply to petroleum/oil/lubricants- (POL) contaminated sites. 3. ICs such as limitations on access, water use, excavations, and property transfers will supplement engineering controls as appropriate for short-term and long-term management to prevent or limit human and environmental exposure to hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Specific ICs include, among other things: limitations on the depth and location of excavations, prohibition of or restrictions on well drilling and use of ground water, requirements for worker use of personal protective equipment, site monitoring, and prohibition of certain land uses, types of vehicles, etc. 4. Organizational units, tenants, and support/contractor organizations must obtain an Excavation Clearance Request (ECR) for all soil disturbing activities impacting soils six inches or more below the ground surface. The review process for approval of an ECR begins with the identification of the current status (known or suspected hazardous waste site or “clean” site) of a work location. ECR’s for work in known or suspected hazardous waste sites: a. will include specific limitations and controls on such work; b. will include specific IC procedures, and notification, monitoring, reporting, and stop work requirements; c. may include procedures for management, characterization, and disposal of any soil or groundwater encountered or removed; d. will identify “project managers” for both the unit/contractor requesting the work and DPW Environment Resources. 5. The DPW project manager will conduct on-site inspections of each work site (at which ICs apply) to determine continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the approved ECR. DPW has the authority to revoke ECR approval if the specified terms and conditions are not being met. ECR forms are available at the Customer Service Desks at: a. Building 730 at Fort Richardson; b. Building 3015 at Fort Wainwright; c. Building 605 at Fort Greely. 6. USARAK has negotiated (with USEPA and/or ADEC) decision documents and/or Records of Decision (RODs) that mandate the implementation of ICs USARAK Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Resources Department (PWE), maintains copies of all decision documents and RODs requiring ICs in its real property files. PWE provides regularly updated post maps showing all areas affected by ICs. These maps can easily be accessed by using an approved intranet mapping interface application. Copies of these maps will be available to each directorate, activity, and tenant organization. To ensure the effectiveness of ICs, all organizational units and tenant activities will be informed on an annual basis of ICs on contaminated soils and groundwater in effect near their facilities. 7. ICs are enforceable by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). Failure to comply with an IC mandated in a decision document or ROD will violate the USARAK Federal Facility Agreement and may result in stipulated fines and penalties. This does not include the costs of corrective actions required due to violation of an established IC. Sharon Richmond
7/3/2002 Meeting or Teleconference Held FFA meeting the week of June 24-28th: ESD conditions were agreed to by all 3 parties, completed a site visit of these milepost sites and agreed to additional well installation to completely characterize the groundwater plume. Installation of the wells will probably occur in the winter. Ann Farris
9/3/2002 Institutional Control Record Established When the OU3 ROD was signed it established ICs for this site, which include: a database with a tracking mechanism that identifies all land areas under restriction and an SOP that identifies the specific restrictions for each site. That SOP, which is updated periodically, is ADEC's files and the admin record. Ann Farris
1/21/2003 Update or Other Action ADEC working with EPA and Army to decide on a final remedy for site. Have agreed to do further delineation of groundwater plume and see if natural attenuation will be protective. Ann Farris
4/23/2003 Meeting or Teleconference Held April Federal Facilities Agreement meeting: 4 new wells were installed at MP2.7, and 3 new ones at MP3.0. They will be sampled this spring. Drillers encountered extensive permafrost on the downgradient side of the hill. The contractors impression is that there is little contaminant movement, particularly at MP2.7 because of the frozen conditions. Ann Farris
7/16/2003 Meeting or Teleconference Held Fort Wainwright Restoration Advisory Board held it's last meeting on July16, 2003. Patrice Buck
5/24/2005 Site Characterization Report Approved Staff approved the OU3 Permafrost Resistivity report. This work was undertaken to map permafrost bodies that might affect groundwater flow off and around the Birch Hill Tank Farm. Sharon Richmond
11/9/2005 Meeting or Teleconference Held ADEC met with Army, EPA, the Corps, and consultants for regularly scheduled FFA meeting. Two damaged monitoring wells were decommissioned and replaced in 2005. Other wells have since frost jacked and require replacement. At the northern boundary of the property at Milepost 3.0, benzene concentrations continue to decrease but benzene increases near the southern property boundary. At Milepost 2.7, contaminant trends remain largely unchanged except at AP-8707 and AP-6034 where benzene concentrations increased substantially. Benzene has decreased at AP-5651. Sharon Richmond
12/21/2005 Update or Other Action Staff reviewed the Milepost 2.7 and 3.0 Treatment Cells Decommissioning Report. These cells were decomissioned in July and August 2003. Soil below pre-established screening levels was disposed of in the Fort Wainwright landfill. Soil above screening criteria was stockpiled and then transported to OIT in 2004 for treatment by thermal desportion. A total of approximately 9,605 cubic yards was treated or disposed of. Confirmation sampling indicated that contaminated soil remained in footprint of the MP 2.7 cell. Approximately 15 cy was excavated. This soil is stockpiled onsite and will be thermally remediated. Sharon Richmond
2/15/2006 Meeting or Teleconference Held Staff attended the regularly scheduled FFA meeting. Sharon Richmond
2/5/2007 Meeting or Teleconference Held CS staff attended the OU3 Federal Facilities meeting in Nov 2006 and the Installation Action Plan Workshop in January 2007. Groundwater monitoring will be continued annually at these sites and sampling frequency will be reevaluated after FY10, based upon the TI Waiver outcome. Sharon Richmond
3/12/2008 Exposure Tracking Model Ranking Initial ranking with ETM completed. Sharon Richmond
6/10/2008 Meeting or Teleconference Held CS staff attended the OU3 Federal Facilities Agreement meeting. Sharon Richmond
4/17/2009 Site Characterization Workplan Approved 2009 WP Tech Memo addendum approved Sharon Richmond
4/17/2009 Meeting or Teleconference Held meeting to discuss construction of Improvised Explosive Device Detonation training area Sharon Richmond
5/26/2009 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) received the 2008 Monitoring Report for OU3 on May 15, 2009. The report presents the results of the groundwater monitoring at the Birch Hill Tank Farm, Railcar Offloading Facility and the Milepost 2.7 and 3.0 source areas. The report also present the results of Long Term Monitoring Optimization and the recommendations for future monitoring. Debra Caillouet
8/27/2009 Update or Other Action The Technical Memorandum, Bioaugmentation Treatability Study, Milepost 2.7 and Milepost 3.0 Sites was approved for implementation. The TM describes the addition of an oxidizing agent (Adventus EHC-O) and a bioremediation and spill control product that biologically degrades petroleum hydrocarbons (Verde Environmental, Micro-Blaze Emergency Liquid Spill Control) to soils, in-situ and ex-situ at the Milepost Sites. Several monitoring wells and former sparge points will also be decommissioned to accommodate the new road construction. Debra Caillouet
8/17/2010 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2010 OU3 Work Plan, Operable Unit 3 Operation and Maintenance, Fort Wainwright, August 2010 approved. Debra Caillouet
8/17/2010 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2010 OU3 Work Plan Addendum, MI Sampling of the Second Soil Pile at the Milepost 3.0 Site, The plan is to characterize a soil stockpile (~185 cubic yards) suspected to have been created during the construction of road upgrades near the Milepost 3.0 site. Debra Caillouet
9/14/2010 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other The 2009 Monitoring Report was approved. Debra Caillouet
6/13/2011 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other comment sent on 2010 Draft Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, May 2011 Debra Caillouet
6/13/2011 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2011 Draft Work Plan, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, June 2011 Debra Caillouet
7/20/2011 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2011 Work Plan, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, June 2011 The work plan incorporates acceptable response to previously supplied comment. ADEC has no objection to the implementation of the proposed work. Debra Caillouet
10/21/2011 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2010 Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, October 2011 Debra Caillouet
5/30/2012 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other Draft 2011 OU3 Monitoring Report Debra Caillouet
9/13/2012 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other Draft 2012/2013 Work Plan, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, Alaska, September 2012 IC inspection only Debra Caillouet
9/28/2012 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other 2012/2013 Work Plan Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, Alaska September 2012, IC inspections only Debra Caillouet
3/16/2015 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other Draft Work Plan Environmental Investigations various Sites, Fort Wainwright Alaska January 2015 was reviewed. This this work plan addresses 17 sites at Fort Wainwright. The plan was written in UFP-QAPP but has major deficiencies requiring a complete rewrite of the document. Detailed comment was sent to the Army. Debra Caillouet
6/15/2015 Update or Other Action The Army was sent a review of the response to comment that was provided for the comments sent in March on the draft work plan. DEC has remaining concerns for the Conceptual Site Model, site specific DQO's and the site history provided. Debra Caillouet
8/31/2015 Update or Other Action Transferred to Fairbanks Susan Carberry
1/13/2016 Meeting or Teleconference Held An RPM meeting was held in Anchorage Alaska. The upcoming 2016 site restoration work and monitoring was discussed. Fort Wainwright institutional control policies and procedures were also discussed. Dennis Shepard
12/13/2016 Meeting or Teleconference Held A two day Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) and Stakeholders meeting was held on December 13 & 14, 2016. The main focus of the meeting was to develop a site discovery and site intake process that would satisfy requirements of the Fort Wainwright FFA, RCRA Permit, and two party agreements. The Army, EPA and DEC committed to a flowchart of the preliminary source evaluation process. Timelines were established for scoping a land use control implementation plan (LUCIP) and developing a contracting schedule for Fort Wainwright contaminated site investigations and remedial actions. Seven sites were proposed for inclusion into the FFA (three party agreement) by the Army and the RPMs documented the assignment of the regulatory path for these sites using a newly developed and agreed to signature form. Dennis Shepard
1/1/2017 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the 2015 Annual Institutional Controls Report, Fort Wainwright, Alaska (August 2016). Dennis Shepard
5/24/2017 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC sent an approval letter for the Data Gap Analysis (UST) Report, Birch Hill Tank Farm Fort Wainwright, Alaska. Dennis Shepard
11/16/2017 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the Final 2016 Monitoring Report Operable Unit 3 (OU-3) Fort Wainwright, Alaska, dated August 2017. Annual groundwater monitoring occurred at three sites; Birch Hill Tank Farm (Hazard ID 1685), Railcar Offloading Facility (Hazard ID 1678) and Milepost 2.7/3.0 Sites (Hazard ID 1673). Erica Blake
10/8/2018 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the 2017 Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, Alaska, dated October 2018. The document describes remedial activities conducted at Operable Unit 3 (OU3) during 2017. Three areas were investigated; Birch Hill Tank Farm, Railcar Off-Loading Facility and the Milepost Sub-Areas. The 2017 activities included annual groundwater sampling within the Birch Hill Tank Farm and Railcar Off-Loading Facility, and institutional control inspections conducted in all OU3 areas, including the Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline (FEP) sites. Annual monitoring at Operable Unit 3 is expected to continue. Erica Blake
8/1/2019 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the Final 2019 CERCLA Sites Work Plan Operable Units 1 through 6 (Dated July 2019). DEC provided a conditional approval on April 15, 2019 so the contractor could begin the 2019 groundwater sampling in advance of finalizing this work plan addendum. Review comments for the draft version of the document was provided on April 26, 2019. The document was prepared to help guide the site activities, data review, and reporting tasks for work conducted at Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites on Fort Wainwright, Alaska (FWA) during the 2019 field season. The U.S. Army Garrison (USAG) Alaska CERCLA sites associated with this Work Plan include Operable Units (OUs) 1 through 6. Erica Blake
8/20/2019 Site Visit DEC participated in a site tour of U.S. Army Garrison Alaska-Fort Wainwright, as part of the August 20-21 Federal Facility Remedial Project Manager meeting. The site tour consisted of visiting Operable Unit 3 (OU3) site Milepost (MP) 2.7/MP 3.0, a possible chemical weapons burial site, the North Town Sinkhole site, the Former North Airfield Hot Point Refueling site (the BLM site), and the Central Heat and Power Plant (CHPP) soil management yard. Erica Blake
8/29/2019 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the Final 2018 Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, U.S. Army Garrison Alaska (dated August 2019). The document describes results of 2018 groundwater monitoring work conducted at Operable Unit 3 (OU3) at Fort Wainwright, Alaska (FWA). The three sites investigated with this report are; Birch Hill Tank Farm, Pipeline Milepost 2.7/3.0 and the Rail Off-Load site. An institutional control (IC) inspection was conducted at all the OU3 sites in 2018, no major IC issues were found. Annual groundwater monitoring is expected to continue in 2019. Erica Blake
7/28/2020 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC approved the Final 2020 CERCLA Site Work Plan Operable Units 1 through 6 Fort Wainwright, Alaska (dated July 2020). The document was prepared to guide site activities, data review, and reporting tasks for work conducted at Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites on Fort Wainwright, Alaska (FWA). CERCLA sites covered by this work plan include Operable Units (OUs) 1 through 6. All six OUs will also be included in the annual institutional controls (IC) inspection. Erica Blake
8/7/2020 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) completed a review of the "2019 Groundwater Monitoring Report Operable Unit 3 (OU3) Fort Wainwright, Alaska (July 2020)" provided by Fort Wainwright Alaska on May 11, 2020. The document describes 2019 groundwater sampling events, evaluates contaminant trends and updates the Long Term Monitoring Optimization (LTMO) analysis Recommendations were to update the LTMO analysis with the 2020 analytical results to continue optimizing the well network at the Railcar Offloading Facility, and to consider an evaluation at the Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline Milepost Source Areas (Remedial Area 3) aquifer (which has low recharge) to determine if the site meets the requirements for an exemption of groundwater cleanup. Sara Marshall
10/5/2020 Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved ADEC signed a contaminated media transport approval form for soil cuttings generated from site work conducted in 2019 at the Operable Unit 3, Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline Milepost 2.7 and 3.0 site. 15 gallons (3, 5-gallon buckets) of material will be transported to NRC for thermal treatment in Moose Creek, Alaska. Erica Blake
2/3/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC provided review comments for the "Draft Groundwater Insufficiency Analysis, FTWW-084 Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline Spill, Operable Unit 3" (dated December 2020) on January 15, 2021. On February 3, 2021, DEC received a letter from the U.S. Army to not proceed with addressing comments on the report at this time. The document provided an evaluation of whether remedial actions at the Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline (FEP) Spill Milepost (MP) 2.7 and 3.0 source areas continue to be protective of human health or the environment. The Army is going to wait and complete the next Five-Year Review (expected this spring 2021) before proceeding any further with review and completion of this document. Erica Blake
2/26/2021 Update or Other Action DEC approved the Explanation of Significant Differences, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, Alaska (dated November 2020). This Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) adopts the 2018 DEC cleanup levels for 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene [56 micrograms per liter (µg/L)] and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (60 µg/L) as remedial action objectives for OU3 sites. Erica Blake
7/19/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided review comments for the "Draft-Final Fifth Five-Year Review Report, Fort Wainwright Fairbanks, Alaska" to the U.S. Army. The document is the fifth Five-Year Review for Fort Wainwright. The remedies at six Operable Units were evaluated. Erica Blake
8/26/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided responses to comments for the "Draft-Final Fifth Five-Year Review Report, Fort Wainwright Fairbanks, Alaska" to the U.S. Army. The Fifth Five-Year Review document evaluated the protectiveness at six Operable Unit sites. Erica Blake
9/8/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided comments for the "Draft 2020 Monitoring Report Operable Unit 3, U.S. Army Garrison Alaska" (dated August 2021) to the U.S. Army. The document describes results of site activities conducted in 2020 within Operable Unit 3 (OU3) on Fort Wainwright, Alaska (FWA). Two sites (Fairbanks Fuel Terminal and Railcar Offload Facility) were sampled and had annual IC inspections conducted. The Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline (FEP) milepost (MP) 2.7 and 3.0 just had an annual IC inspection conducted. Erica Blake
10/6/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided an acknowledgement of receipt letter for the "Final Fifth Five-Year Review Report, Fort Wainwright Fairbanks, Alaska" (undated) to the U.S. Army. The FYR report describes and evaluates the implementation of performance remedies in place at six Operable Units (OUs) on Fort Wainwright, Alaska (OUs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). ADEC does not concur with the protectiveness determinations in the final FYR report. Erica Blake
10/8/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided responses to comments for the "Draft 2020 Monitoring Report Operable Unit 3, U.S. Army Garrison Alaska" (dated August 2021) to the U.S. Army. Responses to review comments were received October 5, 2021 and accepted. ADEC requested a final version of the report be provided for a comment backcheck prior to providing an approval letter. Erica Blake
10/14/2021 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other ADEC provided approval for the "Final 2020 Monitoring Report Operable Unit 3, U.S. Army Garrison Alaska" (dated October 2021) to the U.S. Army. The report describes sample results from groundwater monitoring activities conducted in 2020 within Operable Unit 3 (OU3) sites. The institutional controls (ICs) were also inspected. Erica Blake
10/27/2022 Long Term Monitoring Workplan or Report Review ADEC approved the Final 2021 OU3 Monitoring Report. The annual IC inspections and 5 year groundwater monitoring schedule and well selections will continue as the report recommends. Tim Sharp
9/11/2023 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC reviewed the Draft 2022 Institutional Controls (IC) Report, which details the 2022 IC inspections conducted at Fort Wainwright, Alaska (FWA). The purpose of the annual IC inspection is to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of ICs associated with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Record of Decision (ROD) source areas and Two-Party source areas on FWA. Tim Sharp
9/15/2023 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC completed a review of the Draft 2022 Monitoring Report for Operable Unit (OU) 3. The Army conducted annual groundwater monitoring, natural attenuation evaluations, long-term monitoring optimization (LTMO), and institutional control (IC) inspections at the Fairbanks Fuel Terminal (FFT) and Railcar Offloading Facility (ROLF) sites. Though the Fairbanks-Eielson Pipeline (FEP) milepost (MP) 2.7 and 3.0 sites are only sampled on a 5-year basis, with the next sampling event planned for 2024, the Army also inspects ICs at the FEP sites annually. Recommendations in the report are to continue the sampling program with no changes. Tim Sharp
2/27/2024 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC Approved the Final 2022 Monitoring Report for OU3 on this date. Tim Sharp
4/8/2024 Institutional Control Periodic Reporting DEC Approved the 2022 IC Report for Fort Wainwright CERCLA and Two-Party Sites on this day. Tim Sharp

Contaminant Information

Name Level Description Media Comments
BTEX Between Method 2 Migration to Groundwater and Human Health/Ingestion/Inhalation GroundwaterSoil
DRO > Table C SoilGroundwater
GRO > Table C SoilGroundwater

Control Type

Type Details
Federal or State Agency GIS Database Note
Land Use Plan / Maps / Base Master Plan

Requirements

Description Details
Excavation / Soil Movement Restrictions
Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater Use Restrictions
Maintenance / Inspection Of Engineering Controls
New Construction Restrictions
Advance approval required to transport soil or groundwater off-site.

No associated sites were found.

Missing Location Data

Because the GIS location data for this site has not been entered, we cannot direct you to its position on the map. Click "Continue" to proceed to the Contaminated Sites Web Map or "Close" to return to the site report.
Continue     Close