Northwest Arctic Geographic Response Strategies
SAINT LAWRENCE ISLAND ZONE
The Saint Lawrence Island Zone of the NW Arctic Subarea is depicted below. The green boxes are placed in areas where a pre-planned oil spill response has been developed. The red boxes indicate sites for which a “draft” Geographic Response Strategy (GRS) has been developed. These draft GRS are available for review by stakeholders by clicking on the link to download the document. Before they are finalized the plans will be reviewed by oil spill response professionals to ensure that they protect the resources at each sites as best a possible with the currently available technology.
The sites are also listed in a Site Selection Matrix. This document describes the resources at each site.
Green: indicates sites that have been selected for GRS development by the workgroup.
Red: sites are being developed into GRS.
Download a printable pdf format file of this map and sitelist. The current file date is: April 2013.
To save a copy of this colored map directly to your hard drive:
Windows: right click on the map and select "save image as..." from the menu that appears;
Mac: click and hold on the map, and select the "download image to disk" option from the menu that appears.
List of Candidate Sites for GRS Development
SL-11 Punguuk Islands
SL-12 Qilugnaak Lagoon
SL-13 Northeast Cape
SL-14 Camp Iveetok
SL-15 Stolbi Rocks
SL-16 Kukulek Cape/Savoonga
SL-17 Southwest Cape
SL-18 Naayvaghlak Lagoon
SL-19 Umeyaalak Bay
SL-20 Southeast Cape/Sekeunak Lagoon
We are seeking comments and input from the public on the draft GRS until June 15, 2013. The GRS can be downloaded and reviewed and questions or comments directed to:
Completed GRS for the Saint Lawrence Island Zone
SL-01 – Petngeghyak Lagoon & River
SL-02 – Tapisagek River & Qitnegaq Bay
SL-03 – Sipenpak Lagoon
SL-04 – Tamniq Lagoon
SL-05 – Kentanga Bay
SL-06 – Kevipak Bay
SL-07 – Nayghapak & Aghnak Lagoon
SL-08 – Northwest Cape/Gambell
SL-09 – Ketngipalak
SL-10 – Kangqaak Bay
The GRS Site Selection Process
The GRS site selection process begins with the identification of candidate sites. Candidate sites are identified based on a set of three major site selection criteria.
- environmental sensitivity,
- risk of being impacted from a water borne spill; and
- feasibility of successfully protecting the site with existing technology.
The Work Group has sought public input for the sites selected. Public involvement is essential to ensure that the sites selected and the strategies developed reflected the environmental protection priorities of local communities, stakeholders, and resource users. Once GRS site selection was finalized, the workgroup developed the strategies for each site.
- Threatened and Endangered Species/Habitats
- Subsistence Harvest Areas
- Eel grass beds
- Sheltered Tidal Flats
- Sheltered Rocky Shores
- Seal Haulouts
- Sea Lion Rookeries and Haulouts
- Walrus Rookeries and haulouts
- Large Seabird Colonies
- Waterfowl and Shorebird Spring,Fall or Winter Concentration Areas
- Large Anadromous Fish Streams
- Intertidal Salmon Spawning Areas
- Herring Spawning Areas
- Federal Wilderness Areas, Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Natural Landmarks
- State Refuges, Sanctuaries, and Critical Habitat Areas
- Cultural Resources/Archaeological Sites
- Intertidal Sites
- High Use Commercial Fishing Areas
- High Use Recreational Areas
The workgroup welcomes public input to ensure that everyone with a stake in the area is made aware of Geographic Response Strategies and their importance during an oil spill response.
If you have questions regarding this project, please contact Mark Janes at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This page last updated: April 24, 2013 by Nuka Research & Planning Group, LLC