| Action Date |
Action |
Description |
DEC Staff |
| 3/26/1996 |
Record of Decision |
Active remedial action agreed to at this site. |
Rielle Markey |
| 11/1/1996 |
Update or Other Action |
AS/SVE Treatment system installed |
Rielle Markey |
| 11/8/1996 |
Update or Other Action |
(Old R:Base Action Code = SI - Site Investigation). Previous sampling detected 7,200 ug/L benzene, 330 ug/L ethylbenzene, and 1,200 ug/L xylenes in groundwater; 140 mg/kg benzene in soil. The action date used is the date of the Army Defense Site Environmental Restoration Tracking System Worksheet, which contained the concentration information. |
Former Staff |
| 7/1/1997 |
Update or Other Action |
AS/SVE treatment system taken offline. Quarterly GW monitoring continuing to check for rebound |
Rielle Markey |
| 5/1/1998 |
Long Term Monitoring Established |
No concentration rebound noted. Reduction of GW monitoring to an annual event approved. |
Rielle Markey |
| 1/2/2001 |
Site Added to Database |
Site split off Reckey 199231x127402,FTWW (OU-3) FBK Eielson Pipeline, Mileposts 2.7 and 3. |
Former Staff |
| 1/3/2001 |
Update or Other Action |
Database updated |
Ann Farris |
| 1/3/2001 |
Update or Other Action |
Groundwater results indicate that the Remedial Action Objectives are being met. Removal of the treatment system approved. Closure pending. |
Ann Farris |
| 9/11/2001 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
FFA meeting in Seattle to discuss groundwater monitoring update, product recovery system status, ESD status, and trmt system status. 2000 Monitoring report summarizes monitoring results. ESD is not moving along. Army agreed to generate a document that will include all of their evidence that the MP soils were contaminated from a UST system. This document will be submitted to EPA for a final ruling on the UST exemption from RCRA. |
Ann Farris |
| 9/25/2001 |
Update or Other Action |
Five-Year Review Plan Received. |
Ann Farris |
| 12/12/2001 |
Institutional Control Record Established |
1. All organizations conducting activities on United States Army Alaska (USARAK) controlled land are responsible for complying with established institutional controls (ICs). ICs are administrative, procedural, and regulatory measures to control human access to and usage of property. They are applicable to all known or suspected contaminated sites where contamination has been left in place. 2. These controls have been established to implement the selected remedial actions agreed upon by the U.S. Army (Army), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendment Reauthorization Act (SARA). These controls also apply to remedial actions agreed upon under Two-Party Compliance Agreements. These agreements are concluded between USARAK and ADEC and apply to petroleum/oil/lubricants- (POL) contaminated sites. 3. ICs such as limitations on access, water use, excavations, and property transfers will supplement engineering controls as appropriate for short-term and long-term management to prevent or limit human and environmental exposure to hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Specific ICs include, among other things: limitations on the depth and location of excavations, prohibition of or restrictions on well drilling and use of ground water, requirements for worker use of personal protective equipment, site monitoring, and prohibition of certain land uses, types of vehicles, etc. 4. Organizational units, tenants, and support/contractor organizations must obtain an Excavation Clearance Request (ECR) for all soil disturbing activities impacting soils six inches or more below the ground surface. The review process for approval of an ECR begins with the identification of the current status (known or suspected hazardous waste site or “clean” site) of a work location. ECR’s for work in known or suspected hazardous waste sites: a. will include specific limitations and controls on such work; b. will include specific IC procedures, and notification, monitoring, reporting, and stop work requirements; c. may include procedures for management, characterization, and disposal of any soil or groundwater encountered or removed; d. will identify “project managers” for both the unit/contractor requesting the work and DPW Environment Resources. 5. The DPW project manager will conduct on-site inspections of each work site (at which ICs apply) to determine continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the approved ECR. DPW has the authority to revoke ECR approval if the specified terms and conditions are not being met. ECR forms are available at the Customer Service Desks at: a. Building 730 at Fort Richardson; b. Building 3015 at Fort Wainwright; c. Building 605 at Fort Greely. 6. USARAK has negotiated (with USEPA and/or ADEC) decision documents and/or Records of Decision (RODs) that mandate the implementation of ICs USARAK Directorate of Public Works, Environmental Resources Department (PWE), maintains copies of all decision documents and RODs requiring ICs in its real property files. PWE provides regularly updated post maps showing all areas affected by ICs. These maps can easily be accessed by using an approved intranet mapping interface application. Copies of these maps will be available to each directorate, activity, and tenant organization. To ensure the effectiveness of ICs, all organizational units and tenant activities will be informed on an annual basis of ICs on contaminated soils and groundwater in effect near their facilities. 7. ICs are enforceable by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). Failure to comply with an IC mandated in a decision document or ROD will violate the USARAK Federal Facility Agreement and may result in stipulated fines and penalties. This does not include the costs of corrective actions required due to violation of an established IC. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 7/3/2002 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
FFA meeting the week of June 24-28th: 15.75 was not discussed, but site is still in LTM mode |
Ann Farris |
| 9/3/2002 |
Institutional Control Record Established |
When the OU3 ROD was signed it established ICs for this site, which include: a database with a tracking mechanism that identifies all land areas under restriction and an SOP that identifies the specific restrictions for each site. That SOP, which is updated periodically, is ADEC's files and the admin record. |
Ann Farris |
| 1/21/2003 |
Update or Other Action |
Long-term monitoring results indicated a slight rebound in benzene concentrations at the site. Monitoring is to continue to determine trend. |
Ann Farris |
| 4/23/2003 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
April FFA: Annual groundwater monitoring continues at this site. |
Ann Farris |
| 7/16/2003 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
Fort Wainwright Restoration Advisory Board held it's last meeting on July16, 2003. |
Patrice Buck |
| 5/24/2005 |
Site Characterization Report Approved |
Staff approved the OU3 Permafrost Resistivity report. This work was undertaken to map permafrost bodies that might affect groundwater flow off and around the Birch Hill Tank Farm. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 11/9/2005 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
ADEC met with Army, EPA, the Corps, and consultants for regularly scheduled FFA meeting. Groundwater concentrations of DRO were below ADEC cleanup lvels and COCs were not detected. Future sampling frequencies and/or decomissioning of wells will be discussed during the Five-Year Review. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 12/26/2006 |
Update or Other Action |
Technical Memorandum, Recommendation for No Further Action and Well Decommissioning Milepost 15.75, Operable Unit 3 |
Debra Caillouet |
| 2/5/2007 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
CS staff attended the Federal Facilities meeting for OU3 in november 2006 and the Installation Action Plan Workshop in January 2007. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 10/10/2007 |
Update or Other Action |
Technical Memorandum Decommissioning of Monitoring Wells at Milepost 15.75 Operable Unit 3 |
Debra Caillouet |
| 5/8/2008 |
Exposure Tracking Model Ranking |
Initial ranking with ETM completed. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 6/10/2008 |
Meeting or Teleconference Held |
CS staff attended the OU3 Federal Facilities Agreement meeting. |
Sharon Richmond |
| 8/23/2010 |
Update or Other Action |
In the comments provided by the USACE on the 2009 OU3 Monitoring report it was stated that the Milepost 15.75 had an NFA accepted by ADEC and EPA. In researching this staff was unable to find any documentation. There was a Tech Memo with that recommendation in 2006. Staff replied that because the site is not within the boundaries of Ft Wainwright, there are no institutional controls applicable to the site that would prevent soil movement and that the level of contamination remaining in the soil is unknown, therefore NFA is not appropriate. |
Debra Caillouet |
| 6/13/2011 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
comment sent on 2010 Draft Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, Fort Wainwright, May 2011 |
Debra Caillouet |
| 1/30/2012 |
Institutional Control Record Removed |
Institutional Controls have been removed. |
Debra Caillouet |
| 1/30/2012 |
Long Term Monitoring Complete |
Administrative action on 5/1/2013. |
Kristin Thompson |
| 1/30/2012 |
Cleanup Complete Determination Issued |
Concurrence with NFA Request from Army |
Debra Caillouet |
