Site Report: Jiffy Lube Store #2057

Site Name:	Jiffy Lube Store #2057
Address:	3429 East Tudor Road;East of Dale Street., Anchorage, AK 99507
File Number:	2100.26.159
Hazard ID:	24112
Status:	Cleanup Complete - Institutional Controls
Staff:	IC Unit, 9074655229 dec.icunit@alaska.gov
Latitude:	61.181150
Longitude:	-149.816146
Horizontal Datum:	WGS84

We make every effort to ensure the data presented here is accurate based on the best available information currently on file with DEC. It is therefore subject to change as new information becomes available. We recommend contacting the assigned project staff prior to making decisions based on this information.

Site Chronology
IC / Closure Details
Documents
Associated Sites

Problems/Comments

Petroleum contaminated soils were encountered in association with a failed TTT on a regulated 4,000-gallon tank underground storage tank (UST) containing 5W-30 new motor oil. Unknown amount of contamination present. As of 7/20/2010, diesel range (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) soil and groundwater contamination above cleanup levels remains. Contamination has moved off-site to the north. This file was combined with File L55.194, Event ID 1849, "Jiffy Lube on Tudor", Reckey 1994210121516. Before that, the File was L55.121, Quaker State Minit Lube.

Action Information

Action Date	Action	Description	DEC Staff
8/28/1991	Leaking Underground Storage Tank Release Confirmed - Petroleum	LUST Site created in CSP for source area ID 77842 Failed tank tightness test in 4,000 gallon new oil tank.	Scott Bailey
8/28/1991	Site Added to Database		Scott Bailey
9/12/1991	Update or Other Action	Notice of Release letter sent including request for site characterization and corrective action for UST that failed a Tank Tightness Test.	Robert Weimer
6/26/1994	Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Initiated - Petroleum	Two 4,000-gallon new motor oil USTs (Tanks 1 & 2) and one 3,000-gallon used motor oil UST (Tank 3) were removed from on-site.	Lynne Bush
8/3/1994	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed Soil Disposal Plan by HartCrowser. Verbal authorization was given to transport approximately 60 cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed from Tanks 1 & 2 and ~40 cubic yards from the Tank 3 area to ASR for stockpiling and analysis. Sampling indicated DRO contamination above cleanup levels at the site of all three tanks.	Lynne Bush
8/12/1994	Site Visit	Field visit of site.	Lynne Bush
8/31/1994	Update or Other Action	Notice of Release sent to RP.	Lynne Bush
9/8/1994	Release Investigation	Reviewed a HartCrowser "Underground Storage Tank Removal" Release Investigation dated 8/24/94, received 9/7/94.	Lynne Bush
9/20/1994	Site Characterization Workplan Approved	Reviewed and approved the HartCrowser "Workplan for Additional Site Characterization, Tudor Road", dated 8/26/94, received by DEC 9/1/94.	Lynne Bush
10/26/1994	Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved	Received letter dated 10/24/94 from Alaska Soil Recycling indicating that the Q-Lube soil stockpiles were sampled and subsequently reprocessed to obtain results below cleanup levels.	Lynne Bush
9/13/1995	Update or Other Action	CAPR; Reviewed files.	Lynne Bush
12/19/1997	Update or Other Action	Emily said they are waiting for funds. No remediation done on two sites only CAPS.; Emily; 801-975-4617.	Lynne Bush
12/21/2001	Update or Other Action	File combined with L55.194, Event 1849.	Lynne Bush
5/31/2002	Update or Other Action	Site transferred to DEC staff Amanda Dreyer.	Lynne Bush
6/19/2002	Update or Other Action	Harry Parrime with Pennzoil (713) 546-8660 said the consultants were IT Corp until they went out of business and were bought out by Shaw Environmental. Last report he has is a draft, he thinks it never got finalized.	Amanda Dreyer
4/27/2004	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed groundwater monitoring report. DRO 1.8ppm; RRO 11ppm. MTBE is present.	Eric Henry
5/3/2004	Long Term Monitoring Established	Groundwater monitoring report submitted. DEC requested responsible party perform groundwater monitoring on a regular basis- quarterly. COCs are DRO and RRO.	Eric Henry
6/1/2004	Update or Other Action	Made correction to the database that the correct address to the site is 3429 East Tudor.	Eric Henry
11/15/2004	Long Term Monitoring Established	Eric Henry sent a letter this date to the RP requesting "quarterly monitoring continue until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing."	Bill Petrik
11/15/2004	Update or Other Action	Eric Henry reviewed a GW Monitoring Report dated 11/9/04 and sent a letter with this date stating that DEC requests continued quarterly groundwater monitoring until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing.	Jeff Foster
2/3/2005	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Quarterly groundwater monitoring report from December 2004 received.	Eric Henry
2/4/2005	Update or Other Action	Letter sent by Eric Henry to Shell Oil Products with this date stating that DEC requests continued quarterly groundwater monitoring until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing.	Bill Petrik
10/4/2005	Update or Other Action	Project manager changed from Eric Henry to Bill Petrik.	Sarah Cunningham
10/6/2005	Update or Other Action	As new project manager, reviewed file and locational data. Updated latitude and longitude using Figure 1 of the 11/8/94 Q Lube Inc. Site Investigation Report from HartCrowser in conjunction with the Anchorage Area Atlas and TopoZone Pro High-Resolution Urban Aerial Photo and Street Overlays on a Large Map at a Scale of 1:3,333 NAD83 and a very high degree of confidence in the coordinates.	Bill Petrik
2/3/2006	Update or Other Action	The department received a copy of the GeoEngineers "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, December 2005, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage, Alaska" dated 2/1/06. This replaced the same report received by ADEC dated 1/26/2006. A correction was made to reflect the department requesting resumption of annual monitoring of MW-1 in the June 2006 sampling event, not MW-4 as erroneously reported in the earlier version.	Bill Petrik
2/15/2006	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Sent letter in response to the GeoEngineers report "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling" dated 2/1/06 received by DEC 2/3/06. Quarterly monitoring requested to continue as DRO and RRO levels in at least one MW continue to consistently be above cleanup levels. Requested more information to corroborate consultants claim that MWs 5, 6, and 7 are installed improperly. What has and will be done with IDWs. Requested work plan for 2006.	Bill Petrik
2/17/2006	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed and approved the GeoEngineers "Work Plan for Monitoring Well Installations, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, 3429 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska" dated February 15, 2006 and received by the department February 16, 2006. The work plan calls for installing MWs 8 and 9 and sampling them for DRO and RRO.	Bill Petrik
5/12/2006	Update or Other Action	Reviewed a copy of the GeoEngineers report "results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling; March 2006; Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057; anchorage, Alaska" dated 5/10/06, received by the department 5/11/06. Composed a draft letter in response requesting continued quarterly monitoring for DRO and RRO. Water table has dropped to lowest levels since sampling began and consequently DRO and RRO levels shot up to 2,420 and 10,100 respectively.	Bill Petrik
5/18/2006	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the GeoEngineers report Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, March 2006, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage, Alaska. DRO and RRO levels are the highest in MW-2 since sampling began. MW-3 could not be sampled due to an ice plug. Requested continued quarterly GW monitoring for DRO and RRO. Three “marginal” monitoring wells will be decommissioned and replaced in the same vicinity with one new MW.	Bill Petrik
9/26/2006	Update or Other Action	The CSP received a copy of the GeoEngineers report "Results of Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, June 2006" dated 9/25/06.	Bill Petrik
10/6/2006	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	The CSP sent a letter to Shell Oil Products US after review of the "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, June 2006, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage." DRO and RRO contamination above cleanup levels remains on site. Requested continued long-term sampling and reduced monitoring frequency from quarterly to semi-annual during the months of May and October. Requested a CSM and narrative, Laboratory QA\QC Checklist, necessity of duplicate samples to be taken, submitting a blind duplicate, and reminded the responsible party of the departmental Cost Recovery Policy.	Bill Petrik
11/13/2006	Update or Other Action	CSP staff had a telephone discussion with Jeff Schatz of Delta Environmental in Portland this morning, 503 639-8098. He asked for approval to modify point 4 of the February 15, 2006 GeoEngineers Work Plan for Monitoring Well Installation which calls for drilling two boreholes in conjunction with installation of two monitoring wells. The work plan was approved as is in an ADEC letter dated February 17, 2006. The ground is frozen to 1 – 2 feet and the Shell is very concerned about the presence of buried utilities. In lieu of using a split spoon sampler continuously Mr. Schatz requested approval to use air knifing to 5 feet and then continuous sampling using the split spoon thereafter in each borehole. There would be continuous screening on the way down from the surface and soil samples would be taken at 2.5 feet and 5 feet unless the PID indicated high readings. This modification to the previously ADEC approved work plan was approved by Bill Petrik via phone on 11/13/06.	Bill Petrik
5/3/2007	Exposure Tracking Model Ranking	Initial ranking.	Bill Petrik
6/12/2007	Update or Other Action	The site Project Manager received a copy of the Delta Environmental "Monitoring Well Installation Report" dated 3/16/07. It was initially received on 3/21/07 by another CSP staff.	Bill Petrik
6/19/2007	Update or Other Action	The CSP received a copy of a cc'd letter to Lori Barnett from Pam Post, Department of Law (DOL), dated 6/14/07 indicating that the DOL received a cost recovery check from the RP. The latest bill to the RP was related to the cost recovery period of 7/16/02 through 5/15/04.	Bill Petrik
1/25/2008	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	After review of copies of the Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. "First Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated July 9, 2007 and received by the CSP on 7/13/07, "Second Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 9/7/07 and received by the CSP on 9/13/07, and "Third Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 1/3/08 and received by the CSP on 1/14/08, the Contaminates Sites Program (CSP) sent a letter to the responsible party in response. Long-term monitoring results indicated that there is no decreasing trend in the diesel-range organics and residual-range organics contaminants of concern and generally in uptrends. The letter requested numerous items including: a missing report; correct report errata; laboratory Sample Receipt Checklists be submitted; ground water elevation measurements in all nine monitoring wells; inclusion of a star diagram of all historic ground water flow direction and frequency; addition of three monitoring wells to the sampling regimen; a reduction of the sampling frequency from quarterly to semi-annually; taking a duplicate ground water sample from one well that has historically exhibited the highest contaminant concentrations; clarification of past disposal of investigative derived waste (IDW) water; reminder that approval from the CSP is required prior to transportation of IDW off site; addressing how monitoring wells that needed maintenance was or will be accomplished; submittal to the CSP of a Conceptual Site Model; a clean up work plan within 60 days; indication that qualified people were involved in all site work; and a reiteration of the department’s Cost Recovery Policy.	Bill Petrik
8/15/2008	Update or Other Action	Received a copy of the Delta Environmental "Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159;Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated 8/14/08.	Bill Petrik
8/27/2008	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed a copy of the Delta Environmental "Fourth Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 1/25/08. December 2007 DRO and RRO levels in MW-2 are below cleanup levels and substantially lower than the 9/07 levels. The levels in MW-3 are 12 percent lower for DRO and 45 percent lower for RRO from the 9/07 levels but are still substantially above the cleanup levels.	Bill Petrik
8/27/2008	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed a copy of the Delta Environmental "Response to CSP Letter of January 25, 2008; Former Shell-Branded Station; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159; Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated 4/7/08. All of the CSP requests are met in this document or scheduled to be met in the next report from Delta.	Bill Petrik
9/9/2008	Site Characterization Workplan Approved	Reviewed and sent a letter this date approving the Delta "Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159;Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated August 14, 2008. Requested a CSM be submitted as an approval condition.	Bill Petrik
5/29/2009	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the "Second Quarter 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report" and "Third Quarter 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; Delta Project No. SAK 34-29T-1; SAP No. 120454"; dated August 21, 2008 and November 13, 2008, respectively. RRO and DRO are still above cleanup levels at the site. Continued GW monitoring requested. Use of the static water level in monitoring well MW-3 was eliminated in calculating the groundwater flow direction because it is located in former UST excavation and is probably biasing the results. Consequently, the resulting groundwater flow direction changed from generally west-northwest to north-northeast. Based on the results of the subject reports the CSP sent a letter this date requesting continued groundwater monitoring. The sampling frequency could be reduced to semi-annually instead of quarterly. If you choose to reduce the sampling frequency to semi-annually, the CSP requests that the sampling occurs in May, just after break-up and in September/early October, just before freeze up.	Bill Petrik
9/8/2009	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	The Contaminated Sites Program (CSP) sent a letter to the responsible party after review of the "Second Quarter 2009 Groundwater Monitoring Report; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, Alaska; Delta Project No. SAK 34-29T-1A" dated 7/23/09, received on 7/30/09. Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were sampled including one blind duplicate of MW-3. Work was initiated and completed on 6/9/08. Analytical lab sample results indicated that in MW-2 DRO was ND (<800 ?g/l) and RRO was detected at 2,300 ?g/l which was above the 1,500 ?g/l ADEC 18 AAC 75.345 Table C groundwater cleanup level for RRO. The RRO detection in MW-2 was higher than the prior result (9/08) which was 1,100 ?g/l. The sampling results of MW-3 for DRO and RRO of 1,800 ?g/l and 5,400 ?g/l, respectively, were much higher than the prior event results of ND (<800 ug/l) and 2,800 ?g/l, respectively. Sheen was observed in MW-2 and MW-3 during purging. Laboratory results for ethanol and the five gasoline oxygenates, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) were all ND except for MTBE which ranged from 3.8 ?g/l in MW-9 to 18 ?g/l in MW-3. This was below the 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 470 ?g/l. The report said that ADEC did not have a cleanup level established for MTBE but the latest regs do have it as previously stated. During the subject sampling event, water levels were measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-7, and MW-9 and MW-10. All wells were similar to last September’s measurements but lower than by no greater than 0.08 feet except for MW-10 which was 0.49 foot lower during this event. MW-1 was higher by 0.07 feet. The groundwater flow direction was calculated to be north-northeast at a gradient of 0.003 feet/foot. The direction and gradient have been consistent during the last three monitoring events. Purge water was stored on site in a 55-gallon drum pending analytical results to determine method of disposal. A completed Laboratory Data Review Checklist was submitted with the subject report. No CSM was submitted despite being previously requested. RRO in MW-2 and both DRO and RRO in MW-3 continue to be measurably detected above cleanup levels since groundwater monitoring began in 2004. A CSP letter dated September 9, 2008 conditionally approved a Delta work plan dated 8/14/08. The work plan called for drilling activities to be conducted in late third quarter 2008 before the ground freezes. If drilling activities are unable to be completed before winter, the drilling activities are proposed to be performed in spring 2009 after the ground thaws. The CSP has no indication that this work was undertaken. The letter requested continued groundwater monitoring and clarification as to whether the work plan dated August 14, 2008 and approved by the CSP on September 9, 2008 was implemented or not. If not, why it was not done and a schedule to perform the related work. The letter also requested a conceptual site model.	Bill Petrik
4/5/2010	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the Delta "Third Quarter 2009 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 11/4/09 and received 11/12/09. On 9/16/99 all monitoring wells (MWs) were measured for groundwater (GW) elevation. Water levels are relatively stable in all MWs since 2004 and have risen ~5.5’ since monitoring began in 1994 to 2004 in older MWs. GW flow direction was calculated and was to the northeast at approximately 0.005 feet/foot. MWs 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 were sampled for DRO and RRO. MW-2 exceeded the 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1.1 mg/l for RRO in MW-2 and MW-3 at 2.0 mg/l and 15.0 mg/l, respectively. MW-3 exceeded the 1.5 mg/l DRO cleanup level with a 4.8 mg/l result. These results are within the range of historical results. All other sampling results were ND. Sheen was observed in the purge water of MWs 1, 2, and 3 during the bailing process. Delta conducted a Site Investigation at the site during this quarter which included five soil borings which were converted to temporary MWs. The results of this SI will be submitted under a separate cover. The next monitoring event is scheduled for the 2nd quarter 2010 when MWs 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 will be measured for static water levels and MWs 1, 4, 7, 9, and 10 will be sampled for DRO, RRO, and the five Shell oxygenates. Numerous discrepancies exist in the Laboratory Data Review Checklist. The Chain of Custody Report did not include a recorded cooler temperature but the checklist indicated the cooler temperature within preferred limits. A field duplicate was submitted for lab analysis but not indicated on checklist. The calculated RPD for the precision when comparing the sample from MW-3 and its duplicate is 149% which exceeds the 30% allowable range. The answer in the checklist question indicated that the RPD was within the limits.	Bill Petrik
7/20/2010	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed a copy of the Delta Consultants "Second Quarter 2010, Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 7/13/10 and received 7/19/10. On 5/12/10, monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were gauged for water level and monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were sampled and sent for laboratory analysis for DRO and RRO. DRO were detected above ADEC cleanup levels in the GW sample collected from well MW-3, and its duplicate sample up to 4.6 mg/L. RRO were detected above ADEC cleanup levels in the GW samples collected from wells MW-2, and MW-3 (including duplicate sample), and MW-9 with the maximum result from MW-3 at 10 mg/l, the highest ever noted at the site. In addition, this is the first sampling event for which RRO has been detected above ADEC cleanup levels (or above laboratory method reporting limits) in well MW-9. MW-1 detected RRO at 0.27 mg/l and was its first detection of RRO since sampling began in 1994, although the sampling was intermittent. Depths to GW varied between 7.88 and 9.26’ below the top of casing (TOC). Groundwater flow direction during the time of sampling was to the northeast at an approximate gradient of 0.003 ft/ft. Because the new TOC elevations at MW-9 and MW-10 were not been surveyed due to cutting their tops off after frost heaving, these wells were not included in groundwater gradient calculations. Frost heaving was also noted at wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4. These well casings have not yet been repaired, although the TOC elevations at these wells have likely changed. The calculated groundwater gradient for this quarter may have been compromised by the movement of these well casings. Delta notes that this phenomenon may be responsible for what has historically appeared to be an inconsistent groundwater gradient. During the third quarter 2009, Delta conducted a site investigation in which 5 soil borings were installed and converted to temporary monitoring wells. The work was performed in general accordance with Delta's August 14, 2008 Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment. A report detailing the findings of this investigation, along with a Conceptual Site Model (CSM), is underway and will be submitted under separate cover. The next GW monitoring event is scheduled for the 3rd quarter 2010. Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 will be gauged and sampled for DRO and RRO. Wells MW-5 and MW-6 will be gauged only. The TOCs at wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4 will be repaired, and well TOCs will be re-surveyed. RPDs for duplicate sample were 70 for DRO and 76 for RRO but data is still usable.	Bill Petrik
9/7/2010	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	The CSP reviewed the Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. "2010 Conceptual Site Model and Site Assessment Report" and "Additional Site Assessment Report", both dated July 26, 2010. After five years of GW monitoring no trend in the concentrations of DRO or RRO has been established. The latest laboratory analytical results for GW sampling (September 2009) indicated that DRO is more than three times the cleanup level and RRO contamination is nearly fourteen times this level, both of these exceedances are from monitoring well MW-3. In a letter from the CSP in response to its review of these documents, the CSP requested a work plan for additional investigation and GW monitoring and laboratory analysis of DRO, RRO, BTEX (or VOCs in lieu of BTEX), and PAHs. The letter also requested updated versions of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) components the Human Health (HH) CSM Scoping Form, HHCSM Graphic, and a CSM narrative.	Bill Petrik
3/30/2011	Update or Other Action	Received a copy of the Conestoga-Rovers & Associates “2010 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report” dated 3/17/11.	Bill Petrik
11/28/2011	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	ADEC approved request to treat and dispose of 1 drum of contaminated purgewater.	Robert Weimer
2/22/2012	Site Characterization Report Approved	ADEC reviewed First 2011 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring dated September 2011. The report shows that groundwater results from seven water samples are below 18 AAC 75.345 cleanup levels for BTEX, PAHs, GRO, RRO and DRO. The May 2011 analytical results for benzene concentrations range from ND to less than .001 mg/L. GRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.1 mg/L. DRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.762 and RRO concentrations range from ND to 0.990 mg/L. PAHs concentrations range from ND to less than 0.000943 mg/L. Depth to groundwater was 8.21 to 9.61 feet below ground surface with a historical flow to the north. There is evidence of frost heaving and damage to some well casings, therefore groundwater gradient and flow direction is not accurate.	Katrina Chambon
2/22/2012	Site Characterization Report Approved	ADEC reviewed Second 2011 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring dated January 2012. The report shows that groundwater results from seven water samples are below 18 AAC 75.345 cleanup levels for BTEX, PAHS, RRO, and DRO. Only one groundwater sample resulted above the clean up level of 1.1 mg/L for RRO. RRO concentrations range from ND to 2.2 mg/L. Contaminants concentrations increased in one of the monitoring well water samples. The October 2011 analytical results for benzene concentrations range from ND to less than .001 mg/L. DRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.800 mg/L and PAHs concentrations range from ND to less than 0.000943 mg/L. Depth to groundwater was 8.35 to 9.75 feet below ground surface with a historical flow to the north. There is evidence of frost heaving and damage to some well casings, therefore groundwater gradient and flow direction is not accurate.	Katrina Chambon
3/1/2012	Meeting or Teleconference Held	Held teleconference with Perry Pineda (Shell), Ed Turner (CRA) and Rich Sundet regarding potential site closure with institutional controls. CSP requested Laboratory Data Check Sheets from two Delta reports: Monitoring Well Installation Report dated March 16, 2007 and 2010 Conceptual Site Model & Site Assessment Report dated July 26, 2010	Katrina Chambon
6/27/2012	Exposure Tracking Model Ranking	A new updated ranking with ETM has been completed for source area 77842 1 Used Oil and 2 New Oil USTs.	Katrina Chambon
10/30/2012	Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved	There is one drum of purge water located at the 3429 East Tudor Road site. Phillips Services Company (PSC) will pick up the material and transport to their Anchorage storage area pending transportation to the Seattle area. Final disposition of the material is at the PSC waste water treatment/recycling facility in Kent WA.	Katrina Chambon
12/10/2012	Conceptual Site Model Submitted		Katrina Chambon
3/19/2013	Site Characterization Report Approved	On August 15th and 16th of 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW3, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above DEC’s 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels.DRO concentrations were < 792 µg/L, RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L and all BTEX constituents were < 1.00 µg/L.PAHs were non-detect Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 9 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 feet/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north.	Katrina Chambon
4/2/2013	Site Characterization Report Approved	On October 24th and 25th of 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW4, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above DEC’s 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels except for RRO in MW-9. DRO concentrations were < 889 µg/L; RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L; benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were < 0.50 µg/L; and xylenes were <3.0 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. MW-9 had an RRO concentration of 5,900 µg/L exceeding its 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1,100 µg/L. BTEX concentrations are considered biased low due to inappropriate bottles being used. The consultant noted that MW-9 was missing its J-plug which is could be the likely source of the contamination. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 11 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 feet/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north.	Katrina Chambon
4/22/2013	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	On August 15 and 16, 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW3, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above their 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels. DRO concentrations were < 792 µg/L, RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L and all BTEX constituents were < 1.00 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 9 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 foot/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north. On October 24 and 25, 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW4, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels except for RRO in MW-9. DRO concentrations were < 889 µg/L; RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L; benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were < 0.50 µg/L; and xylenes were <3.0 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. MW-9 had an RRO concentration of 5,900 µg/L exceeding its 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1,100 µg/L. BTEX concentrations are considered biased low due to inappropriate bottles being used. The consultant noted that MW-9 was missing its J-plug which is could be the likely source of the contamination. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 11 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 foot/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north. CSP Response CSP requests that MW-9 be sampled and analyzed for DRO and RRO to confirm that missing J-plug was the likely source of contamination. CSP also suggests that you may want to discuss with your consultant potential closure for this site. There are several issues that need addressing, including findings at MW-9, however, we are available for any discussion on potential closure for this site.	Katrina Chambon
7/26/2013	Meeting or Teleconference Held	Discussion with consultant regarding work that needs to be conducted at the site.	Katrina Chambon
9/6/2013	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	CSP reviewed The First 2013 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report dated August 2013. Four groundwater samples were collected from MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9. RRO concentrations were detected up 2.05 mg/L in MW-9, all other samples were non detect or below cleanup levels. The consultant recommended 1) Quarterly sampling at MW-9, 2)Annual sampling in June 2014 for MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9 3)Re-evaluate once June 2014 data are received CSP agrees with the consultants recommendations.	Katrina Chambon
1/9/2014	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	CSP reviewed The Second 2013 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report dated December 2013. One groundwater sample was collected from MW-9. RRO concentrations were detected up 1.47 mg/L. The consultant recommended 1) Quarterly sampling at MW-9, 2)Annual sampling in June 2014 for MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9 3)Re-evaluate once June 2014 data are received CSP agrees with the consultants recommendations.	Katrina Chambon
4/4/2014	Site Visit	Site visit to observe groundwater sampling; however, monitoring well MW-9 is damaged from frost heaving. This has been an ongoing issue with several of the groundwater monitoring wells for the last couple of years.	Katrina Chambon
6/17/2014	Site Visit	On this day the CSP performed a site visit to observe groundwater sampling. The CSP observed purging and sampling of Monitoring Wells MW1 and MW9. During purging, the bladder pump was lowered to roughly 0.5 foot below the soil/water interface, and at least three well volumes were removed prior to sampling. All sampling was performed in accordance with Alaska Regulations 18AAC75 and the Draft Field Sampling Guidance.	Joshua Barsis
1/14/2015	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed Second, Third, and Fourth Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Reports: Four groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in June of 2014. Monitoring Well MW-9, which is the most contaminated well, exhibited a concentration of RRO at 2.520 milligrams per liter (mg/l). Monitoring Well MW-9 was sampled again in August and October 2014. Analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels from the August and October sampling events. Groundwater flow direction varied during each sampling event from southeast in June, northwest in August, and south-southwest in October.	Joshua Barsis
2/24/2015	Update or Other Action	Reviewed Survey Data document, which provided a record of the survey that occurred in August 2014.	Joshua Barsis
7/14/2015	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	ADEC reviewed the First Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated June 29, 2015. One groundwater monitoring well (MW-9), which is historically the most contaminated well, was sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in March of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest. In a letter dated July 14, 2015, ADEC requested additional groundwater monitoring for Monitoring Wells MW1 through MW4, and MW9.	Joshua Barsis
9/8/2015	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the Second Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 21, 2015. One groundwater monitoring well (MW-9), which is historically the most contaminated well, was sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in June of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest. Monitoring Wells MW1 through MW4, and MW9 will be sampled in subsequent sampling events.	Joshua Barsis
12/2/2015	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the Third Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 21, 2015. Five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in August of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest.	Joshua Barsis
2/4/2016	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the Fourth Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated January 29, 2016. Five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in October of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Historical groundwater data was reviewed from 1994 through 2015. Groundwater flow direction has varied, and no consistent flow direction apparent. Report conclusions requested cessation of groundwater sampling at this site and recommended the site for closure. ADEC will review the file as necessary and determine if this site is eligible for a closure status.	Joshua Barsis
3/2/2016	Update or Other Action	Reviewed the files from 1994 through 2016 and has determined that this site is eligible for closure with institutional controls (ICs). ADEC issued a letter requesting a work plan to decommission all onsite MWs by May 1, 2016.	Joshua Barsis
6/27/2016	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Reviewed the Work Plan for Well Decommissioning, dated May 27, 2016 for the Jiffy Lube Store #2057 site. Wells MW1 through MW7, MW9, and MW10 will be decommissioned by removal.	Joshua Barsis
10/20/2016	Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other	Well Decommissioning report reviewed. All of the monitoring wells were decommissioned on August 16-17, 2016. MW1-MW4, MW-9 and MW-10 were decommissioned by knocking out the bottom of the screen. The well casing and screen were removed allowing the aquifer to fill the borehole. Bentonite chips were added until to 2 feet bgs, where the chips were then hydrated, and the remaining 2 feet was backfilled with gravel and patched with asphalt to match surrounding grade. MW5-MW7 were decommissioned by removing the well casing, adding bentonite chips up to 2 feet bgs, where the chips were then hydrated, and the remaining 2 feet was backfilled with gravel and topped with soil to match the surrounding grade.	Lisa Griswold
10/20/2016	Exposure Tracking Model Ranking	A new updated ranking with ETM has been completed for source area 77842 1 Used Oil and 2 New Oil USTs.	Lisa Griswold
10/21/2016	Update or Other Action	Cleanup complete with institutional controls was approved and mailed to the RP on this date.	Lisa Griswold
10/27/2016	Update or Other Action	Cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) forwarded to current landowner, as the landowner's approval is needed for a CC with ICs.	Lisa Griswold
12/9/2016	Update or Other Action	Request for response regarding the cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) extended 60 days on this date. Response to CC with ICs is requested by February 6, 2017.	Lisa Griswold
1/31/2017	Update or Other Action	Request for response regarding the cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) extended 30 days from previous due date on this date. Response to CC with ICs is requested by March 8, 2017.	Lisa Griswold
4/10/2017	Cleanup Complete Determination Issued	Contamination remains in the subsurface above ingestion and inhalation cleanup levels; however further excavation is impractical vertically due to groundwater and horizontally due to the proximity to the Jiffy Lube facility. Site is asphalt paved and no construction activities are planned in the near future. Groundwater is impacted but has been below ADEC cleanup levels since 2014.	Lisa Griswold
4/10/2017	Institutional Control Record Established	Institutional Controls established and entered into the database.	Lisa Griswold
6/15/2018	Institutional Control Compliance Review	IC compliance review conducted. Staff changed from Lisa Griswold to IC Unit. Closure/IC Details updated. Reminder system set to follow-up every five years.	Kristin Thompson

Action Date

Action

Description

DEC Staff

8/28/1991

Leaking Underground Storage Tank Release Confirmed - Petroleum

LUST Site created in CSP for source area ID 77842 Failed tank tightness test in 4,000 gallon new oil tank.

Scott Bailey

8/28/1991

Site Added to Database

Scott Bailey

9/12/1991

Update or Other Action

Notice of Release letter sent including request for site characterization and corrective action for UST that failed a Tank Tightness Test.

Robert Weimer

6/26/1994

Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Initiated - Petroleum

Two 4,000-gallon new motor oil USTs (Tanks 1 & 2) and one 3,000-gallon used motor oil UST (Tank 3) were removed from on-site.

Lynne Bush

8/3/1994

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed Soil Disposal Plan by HartCrowser. Verbal authorization was given to transport approximately 60 cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed from Tanks 1 & 2 and ~40 cubic yards from the Tank 3 area to ASR for stockpiling and analysis. Sampling indicated DRO contamination above cleanup levels at the site of all three tanks.

Lynne Bush

8/12/1994

Site Visit

Field visit of site.

Lynne Bush

8/31/1994

Update or Other Action

Notice of Release sent to RP.

Lynne Bush

9/8/1994

Release Investigation

Reviewed a HartCrowser "Underground Storage Tank Removal" Release Investigation dated 8/24/94, received 9/7/94.

Lynne Bush

9/20/1994

Site Characterization Workplan Approved

Reviewed and approved the HartCrowser "Workplan for Additional Site Characterization, Tudor Road", dated 8/26/94, received by DEC 9/1/94.

Lynne Bush

10/26/1994

Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved

Received letter dated 10/24/94 from Alaska Soil Recycling indicating that the Q-Lube soil stockpiles were sampled and subsequently reprocessed to obtain results below cleanup levels.

Lynne Bush

9/13/1995

Update or Other Action

CAPR; Reviewed files.

Lynne Bush

12/19/1997

Update or Other Action

Emily said they are waiting for funds. No remediation done on two sites only CAPS.; Emily; 801-975-4617.

Lynne Bush

12/21/2001

Update or Other Action

File combined with L55.194, Event 1849.

Lynne Bush

5/31/2002

Update or Other Action

Site transferred to DEC staff Amanda Dreyer.

Lynne Bush

6/19/2002

Update or Other Action

Harry Parrime with Pennzoil (713) 546-8660 said the consultants were IT Corp until they went out of business and were bought out by Shaw Environmental. Last report he has is a draft, he thinks it never got finalized.

Amanda Dreyer

4/27/2004

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed groundwater monitoring report. DRO 1.8ppm; RRO 11ppm. MTBE is present.

Eric Henry

5/3/2004

Long Term Monitoring Established

Groundwater monitoring report submitted. DEC requested responsible party perform groundwater monitoring on a regular basis- quarterly. COCs are DRO and RRO.

Eric Henry

6/1/2004

Update or Other Action

Made correction to the database that the correct address to the site is 3429 East Tudor.

Eric Henry

11/15/2004

Long Term Monitoring Established

Eric Henry sent a letter this date to the RP requesting "quarterly monitoring continue until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing."

Bill Petrik

11/15/2004

Update or Other Action

Eric Henry reviewed a GW Monitoring Report dated 11/9/04 and sent a letter with this date stating that DEC requests continued quarterly groundwater monitoring until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing.

Jeff Foster

2/3/2005

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Quarterly groundwater monitoring report from December 2004 received.

Eric Henry

2/4/2005

Update or Other Action

Letter sent by Eric Henry to Shell Oil Products with this date stating that DEC requests continued quarterly groundwater monitoring until the contaminant plume is demonstrated to be stable or decreasing.

Bill Petrik

10/4/2005

Update or Other Action

Project manager changed from Eric Henry to Bill Petrik.

Sarah Cunningham

10/6/2005

Update or Other Action

As new project manager, reviewed file and locational data. Updated latitude and longitude using Figure 1 of the 11/8/94 Q Lube Inc. Site Investigation Report from HartCrowser in conjunction with the Anchorage Area Atlas and TopoZone Pro High-Resolution Urban Aerial Photo and Street Overlays on a Large Map at a Scale of 1:3,333 NAD83 and a very high degree of confidence in the coordinates.

Bill Petrik

2/3/2006

Update or Other Action

The department received a copy of the GeoEngineers "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, December 2005, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage, Alaska" dated 2/1/06. This replaced the same report received by ADEC dated 1/26/2006. A correction was made to reflect the department requesting resumption of annual monitoring of MW-1 in the June 2006 sampling event, not MW-4 as erroneously reported in the earlier version.

Bill Petrik

2/15/2006

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Sent letter in response to the GeoEngineers report "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling" dated 2/1/06 received by DEC 2/3/06. Quarterly monitoring requested to continue as DRO and RRO levels in at least one MW continue to consistently be above cleanup levels. Requested more information to corroborate consultants claim that MWs 5, 6, and 7 are installed improperly. What has and will be done with IDWs. Requested work plan for 2006.

Bill Petrik

2/17/2006

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed and approved the GeoEngineers "Work Plan for Monitoring Well Installations, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, 3429 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska" dated February 15, 2006 and received by the department February 16, 2006. The work plan calls for installing MWs 8 and 9 and sampling them for DRO and RRO.

Bill Petrik

5/12/2006

Update or Other Action

Reviewed a copy of the GeoEngineers report "results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling; March 2006; Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057; anchorage, Alaska" dated 5/10/06, received by the department 5/11/06. Composed a draft letter in response requesting continued quarterly monitoring for DRO and RRO. Water table has dropped to lowest levels since sampling began and consequently DRO and RRO levels shot up to 2,420 and 10,100 respectively.

Bill Petrik

5/18/2006

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the GeoEngineers report Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, March 2006, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage, Alaska. DRO and RRO levels are the highest in MW-2 since sampling began. MW-3 could not be sampled due to an ice plug. Requested continued quarterly GW monitoring for DRO and RRO. Three “marginal” monitoring wells will be decommissioned and replaced in the same vicinity with one new MW.

Bill Petrik

9/26/2006

Update or Other Action

The CSP received a copy of the GeoEngineers report "Results of Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, June 2006" dated 9/25/06.

Bill Petrik

10/6/2006

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

The CSP sent a letter to Shell Oil Products US after review of the "Results of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling, June 2006, Jiffy Lube Store No. 2057, Anchorage." DRO and RRO contamination above cleanup levels remains on site. Requested continued long-term sampling and reduced monitoring frequency from quarterly to semi-annual during the months of May and October. Requested a CSM and narrative, Laboratory QA\QC Checklist, necessity of duplicate samples to be taken, submitting a blind duplicate, and reminded the responsible party of the departmental Cost Recovery Policy.

Bill Petrik

11/13/2006

Update or Other Action

CSP staff had a telephone discussion with Jeff Schatz of Delta Environmental in Portland this morning, 503 639-8098. He asked for approval to modify point 4 of the February 15, 2006 GeoEngineers Work Plan for Monitoring Well Installation which calls for drilling two boreholes in conjunction with installation of two monitoring wells. The work plan was approved as is in an ADEC letter dated February 17, 2006. The ground is frozen to 1 – 2 feet and the Shell is very concerned about the presence of buried utilities. In lieu of using a split spoon sampler continuously Mr. Schatz requested approval to use air knifing to 5 feet and then continuous sampling using the split spoon thereafter in each borehole. There would be continuous screening on the way down from the surface and soil samples would be taken at 2.5 feet and 5 feet unless the PID indicated high readings. This modification to the previously ADEC approved work plan was approved by Bill Petrik via phone on 11/13/06.

Bill Petrik

5/3/2007

Exposure Tracking Model Ranking

Initial ranking.

Bill Petrik

6/12/2007

Update or Other Action

The site Project Manager received a copy of the Delta Environmental "Monitoring Well Installation Report" dated 3/16/07. It was initially received on 3/21/07 by another CSP staff.

Bill Petrik

6/19/2007

Update or Other Action

The CSP received a copy of a cc'd letter to Lori Barnett from Pam Post, Department of Law (DOL), dated 6/14/07 indicating that the DOL received a cost recovery check from the RP. The latest bill to the RP was related to the cost recovery period of 7/16/02 through 5/15/04.

Bill Petrik

1/25/2008

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

After review of copies of the Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. "First Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated July 9, 2007 and received by the CSP on 7/13/07, "Second Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 9/7/07 and received by the CSP on 9/13/07, and "Third Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 1/3/08 and received by the CSP on 1/14/08, the Contaminates Sites Program (CSP) sent a letter to the responsible party in response. Long-term monitoring results indicated that there is no decreasing trend in the diesel-range organics and residual-range organics contaminants of concern and generally in uptrends. The letter requested numerous items including: a missing report; correct report errata; laboratory Sample Receipt Checklists be submitted; ground water elevation measurements in all nine monitoring wells; inclusion of a star diagram of all historic ground water flow direction and frequency; addition of three monitoring wells to the sampling regimen; a reduction of the sampling frequency from quarterly to semi-annually; taking a duplicate ground water sample from one well that has historically exhibited the highest contaminant concentrations; clarification of past disposal of investigative derived waste (IDW) water; reminder that approval from the CSP is required prior to transportation of IDW off site; addressing how monitoring wells that needed maintenance was or will be accomplished; submittal to the CSP of a Conceptual Site Model; a clean up work plan within 60 days; indication that qualified people were involved in all site work; and a reiteration of the department’s Cost Recovery Policy.

Bill Petrik

8/15/2008

Update or Other Action

Received a copy of the Delta Environmental "Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159;Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated 8/14/08.

Bill Petrik

8/27/2008

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed a copy of the Delta Environmental "Fourth Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 1/25/08. December 2007 DRO and RRO levels in MW-2 are below cleanup levels and substantially lower than the 9/07 levels. The levels in MW-3 are 12 percent lower for DRO and 45 percent lower for RRO from the 9/07 levels but are still substantially above the cleanup levels.

Bill Petrik

8/27/2008

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed a copy of the Delta Environmental "Response to CSP Letter of January 25, 2008; Former Shell-Branded Station; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159; Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated 4/7/08. All of the CSP requests are met in this document or scheduled to be met in the next report from Delta.

Bill Petrik

9/9/2008

Site Characterization Workplan Approved

Reviewed and sent a letter this date approving the Delta "Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; SAP No. 120454; ADEC File No. 2100.26.159;Delta Project No. SAK 3429T1" dated August 14, 2008. Requested a CSM be submitted as an approval condition.

Bill Petrik

5/29/2009

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the "Second Quarter 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report" and "Third Quarter 2008 Groundwater Monitoring Report; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, AK; Delta Project No. SAK 34-29T-1; SAP No. 120454"; dated August 21, 2008 and November 13, 2008, respectively. RRO and DRO are still above cleanup levels at the site. Continued GW monitoring requested. Use of the static water level in monitoring well MW-3 was eliminated in calculating the groundwater flow direction because it is located in former UST excavation and is probably biasing the results. Consequently, the resulting groundwater flow direction changed from generally west-northwest to north-northeast. Based on the results of the subject reports the CSP sent a letter this date requesting continued groundwater monitoring. The sampling frequency could be reduced to semi-annually instead of quarterly. If you choose to reduce the sampling frequency to semi-annually, the CSP requests that the sampling occurs in May, just after break-up and in September/early October, just before freeze up.

Bill Petrik

9/8/2009

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

The Contaminated Sites Program (CSP) sent a letter to the responsible party after review of the "Second Quarter 2009 Groundwater Monitoring Report; Jiffy Lube Facility No. 2057; 3429 Tudor Road; Anchorage, Alaska; Delta Project No. SAK 34-29T-1A" dated 7/23/09, received on 7/30/09. Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were sampled including one blind duplicate of MW-3. Work was initiated and completed on 6/9/08. Analytical lab sample results indicated that in MW-2 DRO was ND (<800 ?g/l) and RRO was detected at 2,300 ?g/l which was above the 1,500 ?g/l ADEC 18 AAC 75.345 Table C groundwater cleanup level for RRO. The RRO detection in MW-2 was higher than the prior result (9/08) which was 1,100 ?g/l. The sampling results of MW-3 for DRO and RRO of 1,800 ?g/l and 5,400 ?g/l, respectively, were much higher than the prior event results of ND (<800 ug/l) and 2,800 ?g/l, respectively. Sheen was observed in MW-2 and MW-3 during purging. Laboratory results for ethanol and the five gasoline oxygenates, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) were all ND except for MTBE which ranged from 3.8 ?g/l in MW-9 to 18 ?g/l in MW-3. This was below the 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 470 ?g/l. The report said that ADEC did not have a cleanup level established for MTBE but the latest regs do have it as previously stated. During the subject sampling event, water levels were measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-7, and MW-9 and MW-10. All wells were similar to last September’s measurements but lower than by no greater than 0.08 feet except for MW-10 which was 0.49 foot lower during this event. MW-1 was higher by 0.07 feet. The groundwater flow direction was calculated to be north-northeast at a gradient of 0.003 feet/foot. The direction and gradient have been consistent during the last three monitoring events. Purge water was stored on site in a 55-gallon drum pending analytical results to determine method of disposal. A completed Laboratory Data Review Checklist was submitted with the subject report. No CSM was submitted despite being previously requested. RRO in MW-2 and both DRO and RRO in MW-3 continue to be measurably detected above cleanup levels since groundwater monitoring began in 2004. A CSP letter dated September 9, 2008 conditionally approved a Delta work plan dated 8/14/08. The work plan called for drilling activities to be conducted in late third quarter 2008 before the ground freezes. If drilling activities are unable to be completed before winter, the drilling activities are proposed to be performed in spring 2009 after the ground thaws. The CSP has no indication that this work was undertaken. The letter requested continued groundwater monitoring and clarification as to whether the work plan dated August 14, 2008 and approved by the CSP on September 9, 2008 was implemented or not. If not, why it was not done and a schedule to perform the related work. The letter also requested a conceptual site model.

Bill Petrik

4/5/2010

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the Delta "Third Quarter 2009 Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 11/4/09 and received 11/12/09. On 9/16/99 all monitoring wells (MWs) were measured for groundwater (GW) elevation. Water levels are relatively stable in all MWs since 2004 and have risen ~5.5’ since monitoring began in 1994 to 2004 in older MWs. GW flow direction was calculated and was to the northeast at approximately 0.005 feet/foot. MWs 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, and 10 were sampled for DRO and RRO. MW-2 exceeded the 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1.1 mg/l for RRO in MW-2 and MW-3 at 2.0 mg/l and 15.0 mg/l, respectively. MW-3 exceeded the 1.5 mg/l DRO cleanup level with a 4.8 mg/l result. These results are within the range of historical results. All other sampling results were ND. Sheen was observed in the purge water of MWs 1, 2, and 3 during the bailing process. Delta conducted a Site Investigation at the site during this quarter which included five soil borings which were converted to temporary MWs. The results of this SI will be submitted under a separate cover. The next monitoring event is scheduled for the 2nd quarter 2010 when MWs 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 will be measured for static water levels and MWs 1, 4, 7, 9, and 10 will be sampled for DRO, RRO, and the five Shell oxygenates. Numerous discrepancies exist in the Laboratory Data Review Checklist. The Chain of Custody Report did not include a recorded cooler temperature but the checklist indicated the cooler temperature within preferred limits. A field duplicate was submitted for lab analysis but not indicated on checklist. The calculated RPD for the precision when comparing the sample from MW-3 and its duplicate is 149% which exceeds the 30% allowable range. The answer in the checklist question indicated that the RPD was within the limits.

Bill Petrik

7/20/2010

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed a copy of the Delta Consultants "Second Quarter 2010, Groundwater Monitoring Report" dated 7/13/10 and received 7/19/10. On 5/12/10, monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were gauged for water level and monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 were sampled and sent for laboratory analysis for DRO and RRO. DRO were detected above ADEC cleanup levels in the GW sample collected from well MW-3, and its duplicate sample up to 4.6 mg/L. RRO were detected above ADEC cleanup levels in the GW samples collected from wells MW-2, and MW-3 (including duplicate sample), and MW-9 with the maximum result from MW-3 at 10 mg/l, the highest ever noted at the site. In addition, this is the first sampling event for which RRO has been detected above ADEC cleanup levels (or above laboratory method reporting limits) in well MW-9. MW-1 detected RRO at 0.27 mg/l and was its first detection of RRO since sampling began in 1994, although the sampling was intermittent. Depths to GW varied between 7.88 and 9.26’ below the top of casing (TOC). Groundwater flow direction during the time of sampling was to the northeast at an approximate gradient of 0.003 ft/ft. Because the new TOC elevations at MW-9 and MW-10 were not been surveyed due to cutting their tops off after frost heaving, these wells were not included in groundwater gradient calculations. Frost heaving was also noted at wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4. These well casings have not yet been repaired, although the TOC elevations at these wells have likely changed. The calculated groundwater gradient for this quarter may have been compromised by the movement of these well casings. Delta notes that this phenomenon may be responsible for what has historically appeared to be an inconsistent groundwater gradient. During the third quarter 2009, Delta conducted a site investigation in which 5 soil borings were installed and converted to temporary monitoring wells. The work was performed in general accordance with Delta's August 14, 2008 Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment. A report detailing the findings of this investigation, along with a Conceptual Site Model (CSM), is underway and will be submitted under separate cover. The next GW monitoring event is scheduled for the 3rd quarter 2010. Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4, MW-7, MW-9, and MW-10 will be gauged and sampled for DRO and RRO. Wells MW-5 and MW-6 will be gauged only. The TOCs at wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4 will be repaired, and well TOCs will be re-surveyed. RPDs for duplicate sample were 70 for DRO and 76 for RRO but data is still usable.

Bill Petrik

9/7/2010

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

The CSP reviewed the Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. "2010 Conceptual Site Model and Site Assessment Report" and "Additional Site Assessment Report", both dated July 26, 2010. After five years of GW monitoring no trend in the concentrations of DRO or RRO has been established. The latest laboratory analytical results for GW sampling (September 2009) indicated that DRO is more than three times the cleanup level and RRO contamination is nearly fourteen times this level, both of these exceedances are from monitoring well MW-3. In a letter from the CSP in response to its review of these documents, the CSP requested a work plan for additional investigation and GW monitoring and laboratory analysis of DRO, RRO, BTEX (or VOCs in lieu of BTEX), and PAHs. The letter also requested updated versions of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) components the Human Health (HH) CSM Scoping Form, HHCSM Graphic, and a CSM narrative.

Bill Petrik

3/30/2011

Update or Other Action

Received a copy of the Conestoga-Rovers & Associates “2010 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report” dated 3/17/11.

Bill Petrik

11/28/2011

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

ADEC approved request to treat and dispose of 1 drum of contaminated purgewater.

Robert Weimer

2/22/2012

Site Characterization Report Approved

ADEC reviewed First 2011 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring dated September 2011. The report shows that groundwater results from seven water samples are below 18 AAC 75.345 cleanup levels for BTEX, PAHs, GRO, RRO and DRO. The May 2011 analytical results for benzene concentrations range from ND to less than .001 mg/L. GRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.1 mg/L. DRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.762 and RRO concentrations range from ND to 0.990 mg/L. PAHs concentrations range from ND to less than 0.000943 mg/L. Depth to groundwater was 8.21 to 9.61 feet below ground surface with a historical flow to the north. There is evidence of frost heaving and damage to some well casings, therefore groundwater gradient and flow direction is not accurate.

Katrina Chambon

2/22/2012

Site Characterization Report Approved

ADEC reviewed Second 2011 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring dated January 2012. The report shows that groundwater results from seven water samples are below 18 AAC 75.345 cleanup levels for BTEX, PAHS, RRO, and DRO. Only one groundwater sample resulted above the clean up level of 1.1 mg/L for RRO. RRO concentrations range from ND to 2.2 mg/L. Contaminants concentrations increased in one of the monitoring well water samples. The October 2011 analytical results for benzene concentrations range from ND to less than .001 mg/L. DRO concentrations range from ND to less than 0.800 mg/L and PAHs concentrations range from ND to less than 0.000943 mg/L. Depth to groundwater was 8.35 to 9.75 feet below ground surface with a historical flow to the north. There is evidence of frost heaving and damage to some well casings, therefore groundwater gradient and flow direction is not accurate.

Katrina Chambon

3/1/2012

Meeting or Teleconference Held

Held teleconference with Perry Pineda (Shell), Ed Turner (CRA) and Rich Sundet regarding potential site closure with institutional controls. CSP requested Laboratory Data Check Sheets from two Delta reports: Monitoring Well Installation Report dated March 16, 2007 and 2010 Conceptual Site Model & Site Assessment Report dated July 26, 2010

Katrina Chambon

6/27/2012

Exposure Tracking Model Ranking

A new updated ranking with ETM has been completed for source area 77842 1 Used Oil and 2 New Oil USTs.

Katrina Chambon

10/30/2012

Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved

There is one drum of purge water located at the 3429 East Tudor Road site. Phillips Services Company (PSC) will pick up the material and transport to their Anchorage storage area pending transportation to the Seattle area. Final disposition of the material is at the PSC waste water treatment/recycling facility in Kent WA.

Katrina Chambon

12/10/2012

Conceptual Site Model Submitted

Katrina Chambon

3/19/2013

Site Characterization Report Approved

On August 15th and 16th of 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW3, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above DEC’s 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels.DRO concentrations were < 792 µg/L, RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L and all BTEX constituents were < 1.00 µg/L.PAHs were non-detect Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 9 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 feet/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north.

Katrina Chambon

4/2/2013

Site Characterization Report Approved

On October 24th and 25th of 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW4, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above DEC’s 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels except for RRO in MW-9. DRO concentrations were < 889 µg/L; RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L; benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were < 0.50 µg/L; and xylenes were <3.0 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. MW-9 had an RRO concentration of 5,900 µg/L exceeding its 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1,100 µg/L. BTEX concentrations are considered biased low due to inappropriate bottles being used. The consultant noted that MW-9 was missing its J-plug which is could be the likely source of the contamination. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 11 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 feet/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north.

Katrina Chambon

4/22/2013

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

On August 15 and 16, 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW3, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above their 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels. DRO concentrations were < 792 µg/L, RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L and all BTEX constituents were < 1.00 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 9 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 foot/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north. On October 24 and 25, 2012, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1 thru MW4, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10. Groundwater samples were analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO); residual range organics (RRO); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX); and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). No analytes were detected above 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup levels except for RRO in MW-9. DRO concentrations were < 889 µg/L; RRO concentrations were < 1,000 µg/L; benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were < 0.50 µg/L; and xylenes were <3.0 µg/L. PAHs were non-detect. MW-9 had an RRO concentration of 5,900 µg/L exceeding its 18 AAC 75.345 Table C cleanup level of 1,100 µg/L. BTEX concentrations are considered biased low due to inappropriate bottles being used. The consultant noted that MW-9 was missing its J-plug which is could be the likely source of the contamination. Groundwater depths ranged from 8 to 11 feet below ground surface with an approximate gradient of 0.013 foot/foot. Groundwater flow is to the north. CSP Response CSP requests that MW-9 be sampled and analyzed for DRO and RRO to confirm that missing J-plug was the likely source of contamination. CSP also suggests that you may want to discuss with your consultant potential closure for this site. There are several issues that need addressing, including findings at MW-9, however, we are available for any discussion on potential closure for this site.

Katrina Chambon

7/26/2013

Meeting or Teleconference Held

Discussion with consultant regarding work that needs to be conducted at the site.

Katrina Chambon

9/6/2013

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

CSP reviewed The First 2013 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report dated August 2013. Four groundwater samples were collected from MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9. RRO concentrations were detected up 2.05 mg/L in MW-9, all other samples were non detect or below cleanup levels. The consultant recommended 1) Quarterly sampling at MW-9, 2)Annual sampling in June 2014 for MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9 3)Re-evaluate once June 2014 data are received CSP agrees with the consultants recommendations.

Katrina Chambon

1/9/2014

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

CSP reviewed The Second 2013 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report dated December 2013. One groundwater sample was collected from MW-9. RRO concentrations were detected up 1.47 mg/L. The consultant recommended 1) Quarterly sampling at MW-9, 2)Annual sampling in June 2014 for MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9 3)Re-evaluate once June 2014 data are received CSP agrees with the consultants recommendations.

Katrina Chambon

4/4/2014

Site Visit

Site visit to observe groundwater sampling; however, monitoring well MW-9 is damaged from frost heaving. This has been an ongoing issue with several of the groundwater monitoring wells for the last couple of years.

Katrina Chambon

6/17/2014

Site Visit

On this day the CSP performed a site visit to observe groundwater sampling. The CSP observed purging and sampling of Monitoring Wells MW1 and MW9. During purging, the bladder pump was lowered to roughly 0.5 foot below the soil/water interface, and at least three well volumes were removed prior to sampling. All sampling was performed in accordance with Alaska Regulations 18AAC75 and the Draft Field Sampling Guidance.

Joshua Barsis

1/14/2015

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed Second, Third, and Fourth Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Reports: Four groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in June of 2014. Monitoring Well MW-9, which is the most contaminated well, exhibited a concentration of RRO at 2.520 milligrams per liter (mg/l). Monitoring Well MW-9 was sampled again in August and October 2014. Analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels from the August and October sampling events. Groundwater flow direction varied during each sampling event from southeast in June, northwest in August, and south-southwest in October.

Joshua Barsis

2/24/2015

Update or Other Action

Reviewed Survey Data document, which provided a record of the survey that occurred in August 2014.

Joshua Barsis

7/14/2015

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

ADEC reviewed the First Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated June 29, 2015. One groundwater monitoring well (MW-9), which is historically the most contaminated well, was sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in March of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest. In a letter dated July 14, 2015, ADEC requested additional groundwater monitoring for Monitoring Wells MW1 through MW4, and MW9.

Joshua Barsis

9/8/2015

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the Second Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 21, 2015. One groundwater monitoring well (MW-9), which is historically the most contaminated well, was sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in June of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest. Monitoring Wells MW1 through MW4, and MW9 will be sampled in subsequent sampling events.

Joshua Barsis

12/2/2015

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the Third Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 21, 2015. Five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in August of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Groundwater flow direction was to the northwest.

Joshua Barsis

2/4/2016

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the Fourth Quarter 2015 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated January 29, 2016. Five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-9) were sampled for diesel range organics (DRO) and residual range organics (RRO) in October of 2015. All analytical results for DRO and RRO were below ADEC groundwater cleanup levels. Historical groundwater data was reviewed from 1994 through 2015. Groundwater flow direction has varied, and no consistent flow direction apparent. Report conclusions requested cessation of groundwater sampling at this site and recommended the site for closure. ADEC will review the file as necessary and determine if this site is eligible for a closure status.

Joshua Barsis

3/2/2016

Update or Other Action

Reviewed the files from 1994 through 2016 and has determined that this site is eligible for closure with institutional controls (ICs). ADEC issued a letter requesting a work plan to decommission all onsite MWs by May 1, 2016.

Joshua Barsis

6/27/2016

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Reviewed the Work Plan for Well Decommissioning, dated May 27, 2016 for the Jiffy Lube Store #2057 site. Wells MW1 through MW7, MW9, and MW10 will be decommissioned by removal.

Joshua Barsis

10/20/2016

Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other

Well Decommissioning report reviewed. All of the monitoring wells were decommissioned on August 16-17, 2016. MW1-MW4, MW-9 and MW-10 were decommissioned by knocking out the bottom of the screen. The well casing and screen were removed allowing the aquifer to fill the borehole. Bentonite chips were added until to 2 feet bgs, where the chips were then hydrated, and the remaining 2 feet was backfilled with gravel and patched with asphalt to match surrounding grade. MW5-MW7 were decommissioned by removing the well casing, adding bentonite chips up to 2 feet bgs, where the chips were then hydrated, and the remaining 2 feet was backfilled with gravel and topped with soil to match the surrounding grade.

Lisa Griswold

10/20/2016

Exposure Tracking Model Ranking

A new updated ranking with ETM has been completed for source area 77842 1 Used Oil and 2 New Oil USTs.

Lisa Griswold

10/21/2016

Update or Other Action

Cleanup complete with institutional controls was approved and mailed to the RP on this date.

Lisa Griswold

10/27/2016

Update or Other Action

Cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) forwarded to current landowner, as the landowner's approval is needed for a CC with ICs.

Lisa Griswold

12/9/2016

Update or Other Action

Request for response regarding the cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) extended 60 days on this date. Response to CC with ICs is requested by February 6, 2017.

Lisa Griswold

1/31/2017

Update or Other Action

Request for response regarding the cleanup complete with institutional controls (CC with ICs) extended 30 days from previous due date on this date. Response to CC with ICs is requested by March 8, 2017.

Lisa Griswold

4/10/2017

Cleanup Complete Determination Issued

Contamination remains in the subsurface above ingestion and inhalation cleanup levels; however further excavation is impractical vertically due to groundwater and horizontally due to the proximity to the Jiffy Lube facility. Site is asphalt paved and no construction activities are planned in the near future. Groundwater is impacted but has been below ADEC cleanup levels since 2014.

Lisa Griswold

4/10/2017

Institutional Control Record Established

Institutional Controls established and entered into the database.

Lisa Griswold

6/15/2018

Institutional Control Compliance Review

IC compliance review conducted. Staff changed from Lisa Griswold to IC Unit. Closure/IC Details updated. Reminder system set to follow-up every five years.

Kristin Thompson

Contaminant Information

Name	Level Description	Media	Comments
DRO	> Human Health/Ingestion/Inhalation	Soil
RRO	> Human Health/Ingestion/Inhalation	Soil

Name

Level Description

Media

Comments

DRO

> Human Health/Ingestion/Inhalation

Soil

RRO

> Human Health/Ingestion/Inhalation

Soil

Control Type

Type	Details
Notice of Environmental Contamination

Type

Details

Notice of Environmental Contamination

Requirements

Description	Details
Advance approval required to transport soil or groundwater off-site.	Standard condition.
Movement or use of contaminated material (including on site) in a manner that results in a violation of the water quality standards is prohibited (18 AAC 70)	Standard condition.
Other	Standard condition.
Other	Sand Venture LLC must report to ADEC every 5 years to document land use, or report as soon as they become aware of any change in land ownership and/or use.
Groundwater Use Restrictions	Installation of groundwater wells requires ADEC approval.
When Contaminated Soil is Accessible, Remediation Should Occur	Sub-surface soil contamination is located in the vicinity of the former USTs and beneath the Jiffy Lube Facility. If contamination is encountered in the future or if the soil becomes accessible, the soil must be evaluated and contamination address in accordance with an ADEC approved work plan.

Description

Details

Advance approval required to transport soil or groundwater off-site.

Standard condition.

Movement or use of contaminated material (including on site) in a manner that results in a violation of the water quality standards is prohibited (18 AAC 70)

Standard condition.

Other

Standard condition.

Other

Sand Venture LLC must report to ADEC every 5 years to document land use, or report as soon as they become aware of any change in land ownership and/or use.

Groundwater Use Restrictions

Installation of groundwater wells requires ADEC approval.

When Contaminated Soil is Accessible, Remediation Should Occur

Sub-surface soil contamination is located in the vicinity of the former USTs and beneath the Jiffy Lube Facility. If contamination is encountered in the future or if the soil becomes accessible, the soil must be evaluated and contamination address in accordance with an ADEC approved work plan.

Recorded Notice of Environmental Contamination

Cleanup complete with institutional controls

No associated sites were found.

Missing Location Data

Because the GIS location data for this site has not been entered, we cannot direct you to its position on the map. Click "Continue" to proceed to the Contaminated Sites Web Map or "Close" to return to the site report.

Continue Close

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

Site Report: Jiffy Lube Store #2057

Site Chronology

IC / Closure Details

Documents

Associated Sites

Problems/Comments

Action Information

Contaminant Information

Control Type

Requirements

Recorded Notice of Environmental Contamination

Cleanup complete with institutional controls

Missing Location Data

State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation