Action Date |
Action |
Description |
DEC Staff |
7/6/2005 |
Site Visit |
John Brown of the PERP met with Mr. Branch at the site and reviewed the circumstances and location of the spill. Mr. Brown indicated that the reporting of the incident was extremely delinquent and any further violations of the reporting procedures could possible lead to enforcement actions. |
Young Ha |
6/5/2007 |
Site Visit |
Young Ha and Frank Wesser of the PERP conducted a site visit to become familiar with the site, monitor sampling activity, and assess the contaminated soil stockpile situation. Further sampling and assessment of the contamination will not be conducted at this time but will be addressed when the building is decommissioned or moved.
The PERP recommended comparing the cost of taking the soil stockpile to a remediation facility as opposed to landfarming it That consideration will be undertaken. Mr. Nardini indicated that a disposal plan would be submitted once the sample characterization sample results are received and reviewed.
A letter was sent to Mr. Britton this date. The letter indicated financial responsibility for ADEC costs as well as the need for advance approval from ADEC for response actions including approving cleanup plans, monitoring cleanup activity progress, and providing guidance as necessary. The letter reiterated that Mr. Nardini indicated that future activites to be undertaken included collection of characterization samples, collection of confirmation samples from the excavated area, dosposal of the cont6aminated soil stockpile, and development of a site assessment plan to determine how much oil was actually spilled and how much oil remains neneath the building.
Stockpile sampling was conducted this date by Mark Vania of URS and samples send for laboratory analysis. |
Young Ha |
6/19/2007 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
Received the SGS laboratory stockpile sampling results report. Three samples were analyzed for DRO and RRO and the results ranged, in mg/kg, from 419 to 758 for DRO, and from 9,010 to 10,600 for RRO. Only the DRO cleanup level of 250 mg/kg was exceeeded. the RRO cleanup level is 11,000 mg/kg. |
Young Ha |
10/25/2007 |
Offsite Soil or Groundwater Disposal Approved |
21.05 tons of stockpiled soil were transported to Alaska Soil Recycling in Anchorage on this date as authorized by the 10/9/07 PERP letter. The soils were co-mingled with soils of similar contaminants for treatment and disposal. |
Young Ha |
1/31/2008 |
Spill Transferred from Prevention Preparedness and Response Program |
A letter was finalized this date indicating that this site was transferred by the PERP staff to the COntaminated Sites Program. Spill Date = 1/1/2004; Spill Number 04239900101; Substance = Engine Lube Oil; Quantity = ~150 Gallons. |
Young Ha |
9/16/2009 |
Update or Other Action |
The CSP reviewed the file and requested a work plan for further site characterization and a summary of work completed to date in report format. |
Bill Petrik |
5/27/2010 |
Site Added to Database |
A new site has been added to the database |
Mitzi Read |
5/27/2010 |
Exposure Tracking Model Ranking |
Initial ranking with ETM completed for source area id: 78889 name: Point MacKenzie Northern Eclipse LNG Plant |
Mitzi Read |
6/4/2010 |
Site Characterization Report Approved |
Reviewed 2005 Baseline Site Assessment Report. 15 soil boring were advanced in areas of concern identified during a Phase I Assessment. Several of the process structures at the site have metal grate flooring allowing contaminants to migrate directly to the soil. A water sample was also collected from the onsite drinking water well. DRO was detected up to 30,000 mg/kg, RRO was detected up to 19,400 mg/kg, and ethylene glycol was detected up to 1,180 mg/kg. DRO and RRO were not detected in the onsite drinking water well. DRO above the Migration to Groundwater cleanup level was found in borehole WSB-2 at 3 feet bgs, however the extent of contamination in this area was not fully delineated. |
Bill O'Connell |
6/9/2010 |
Potentially Responsible Party/State Interest Letter |
|
Bill O'Connell |
6/9/2010 |
Site Visit |
Site visit conducted today with consultant and personnel from FNG |
Bill O'Connell |
6/9/2010 |
Update or Other Action |
The source areas included at this site include another site for which the status has been changed to non-qualifying. The site named Northern Eclipse LNG Plant Engine Oil Leak, Haz ID 4604, File # 2202.38.010 is co-located with the source area covered by soil borings WSB-3 to WSB-6 and all activities related to investigation and remediation of this source area will be tracked under this site. |
Bill O'Connell |
7/9/2010 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
Reviewed Soil Remediation Work Plan for Point Mackenzie LNG Plant Facility. Prior to remediation, additional characterization will be conducted including additional soil sampling at three compressor areas, the former garage, and near the 2005 boring WSB-1. The onsite water well will also be sampled and analyzed for DRO and RRO, although this well is not used for drinking water. Soil excavation will be conducted at the following areas identified in 2005: WSB-1/WSB-2, WSB-4, WSB-7/WSB-8, WSB-10, WSB-15, and at any additional areas identified in 2010 with contaminant concentrations above cleanup levels. Contaminated soil will be transported to ASR for thermal treatment. Confirmation soil samples will be collected in accordance with Table 1 from ADEC's May 2010 Draft Field Sampling Procedures Manual. |
Bill O'Connell |
8/17/2010 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
Reviewed Letter Report of Soil Characterization Results for Point Mackenzie LNG Facility. Soil samples were collected from 10 locations at depths of 0.5, 1.5, and 3 feet bgs and a water sample was collected from the onsite water well. Soil samples were collected to confirm the results of the 2005 investigation and to further delineate the extent of hydrocarbon impacts prior to remedial activities being conducted at the site. Sampling confirmed the presence of contamination at the LNG Skid, adjacent to the Compressors, at the Amine Building and at a stained area near the former garage. Remedial action is scheduled for late August 2010. |
Bill O'Connell |
12/22/2010 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
Reviewed Soil Remediation Report, FNG Point Mackenzie LNG Plant Facility. Excavation of contaminated soil was conducted in August and September 2010 using a track hoe, vacuum truck, and by hand digging. A total of 171 cy of impacted soil were removed from excavations at the LNG Skid, Compressor Area, Booster Compressor Area, New Compressor Area, Amine Building, Former Garage, and Fuel Storage Connex followed by the collection of confirmation soil samples from each excavation. At the LNG skid, approximately 78 cy of impacted soil were excavated. Confirmation samples contained DRO up to 5,010 mg/kg at 6 feet bgs. At the Compressor Area, approximately 50 cy of impacted soil were excavated. Confirmation samples contained DRO up to 1,020 mg/kg at 5.5 ft bgs. A deeper sample collected at 8.5 ft bgs contained DRO at 454 mg/kg. At the Booster Compressor Area, approximately 16 cy of impacted soil were excavated. Confirmation samples contained DRO up to 530 mg/kg at 3 ft bgs. Excavation in these areas was limited by the presence of buildings, under which contaminated soil remains in place. Impacted soil was successfully removed from the New Compressor Area, Amine Building, Former Garage, and Fuel Storage Connex with confirmation samples containing contaminants below cleanup levels. A sample collected from the onsite drinking water well did not contain detectable concentrations of contaminants. |
Bill O'Connell |
3/3/2011 |
Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other |
Reviewed Contaminant Fate and Transport Evaluation-SESOIL for Pt. Mackenzie Liquid Natural Gas Plant Facility. The SESOIL modeling was required because the deepest confirmation samples collected following site remediation contained DRO above the migration to groundwater cleanup level. Input parameters included a DRO concentration of 4,110 mg/kg, a depth to groundwater of 215 feet bgs based on the log from the drinking water well onsite, and the conservative assumption that the subsurface material was a homogenous sand. Additional parameters included conservative default values for TOC, permeability etc. The results of the SESOIL modeling indicate groundwater will not be impacted, with the maximum potential depth of migration at 157 feet bgs. |
Bill O'Connell |
3/7/2011 |
Exposure Tracking Model Ranking |
A new updated ranking with ETM has been completed for source area 78889 Point MacKenzie Northern Eclipse LNG Plant. |
Bill O'Connell |
4/6/2011 |
Institutional Control Record Established |
Institutional Controls established and entered into the database. |
Bill O'Connell |
4/6/2011 |
Cleanup Complete Determination Issued |
The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Contaminated Sites Program (ADEC) has completed a review of the environmental records associated with the Point MacKenzie Fairbanks Natural Gas Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Plant located near Wasilla, Alaska. Based on the information provided to date, it has been determined that the contaminant concentrations remaining on site do not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment and no further remedial action will be required as long as the site is in compliance with established institutional controls (ICs). |
Bill O'Connell |
2/9/2012 |
Institutional Control Compliance Review |
IC review conducted, staff changed from O'Connell to IC Unit, five year review added as an IC requirement, and the reminder system was updated. |
Evonne Reese |
4/12/2016 |
Institutional Control Compliance Review |
An IC review was conducted and an IC reminder letter issued to the responsible party on this date. |
Nathan Maxwell |
5/31/2017 |
Institutional Control Compliance Review |
IC compliance review conducted. Closure/IC Details updated. Reminder system set for follow-ups to occur every five years. |
Kristin Thompson |
10/8/2024 |
Institutional Control Compliance Review |
IC compliance review completed on this date. An IC reminder letter was issued to the landowner. The next review will be in five years’ time. |
Gaige Robinson |