Skip to content Skip to content

Site Report: Granite Mountain AFS DA020

Site Name: Granite Mountain AFS DA020
Address: ~30 Miles N of Koyuk, Koyuk, AK 99753
File Number: 610.38.001
Hazard ID: 25619
Status: Cleanup Complete - Institutional Controls
Staff: Brian Watts, 9072694702 brian.watts@alaska.gov
Latitude: 65.418325
Longitude: -161.240264
Horizontal Datum:WGS84

We make every effort to ensure the data presented here is accurate based on the best available information currently on file with DEC. It is therefore subject to change as new information becomes available. We recommend contacting the assigned project staff prior to making decisions based on this information.

Problems/Comments

Site DA020 (also known as Disposal Areas E, F, and G; AOC14) consists of the former disposal areas in the Mid Mountain region, along the east side of the access road between the Upper and Lower Camps. The areas of disturbed soil are as follows: Area E 280 feet by 180 feet Area F 390 feet by 270 feet Area G 270 feet by 225 feet The area had no visible soil stains or surface debris was found on site, a metal detection survey indicated no buried materials in areas E and G. 2 surface debris were noted in area F. These observations suggest that these areas may have served primarily as gravel borrow pits. Area E & G: No indications of fuel contaminants were observed during 1999 RI test pitting, therefore, the site requires no further action under state law and will be designated Cleanup Complete. Area F: Soil sample results revealed DRO and RRO concentrations to be below the ADEC criteria (Lower Camp 250 mg/kg and 10,000 mg/kg, respectively). Because no fuel or hazardous substances were found at concentrations above applicable cleanup levels, the site requires no further action under state law and will be designated Cleanup Complete. However, surface debris was observed. Due to the observation of debris and the potential existence of subsurface solid waste, ICs will be put in place at Area F. Removal of solid waste at the site would cost an estimated $10 million and is not warranted. ICs will be put in place to document the location and boundaries of the disposal site and limit future activities that could expose buried wastes or cause the potential spread of contaminants, or placement of solid waste in environmentally sensitive areas.

Action Information

Action Date Action Description DEC Staff
3/11/2011 Site Added to Database A new site has been added to the database Mitzi Read
6/6/2014 Update or Other Action 1994 PA/SI – No visible soil stains or surface debris was found on site, a metal detection survey indicated no buried materials in areas E and G. 2 surface debris were noted in area F. These observations suggest that these areas may have served primarily as gravel borrow pits. Consequently, no environmental samples were collected. Anna Iverson
6/6/2014 Update or Other Action 1999 RI – 2 soil boring were to be drilled at each disposal area, but due to rock conditions, test pits were excavated instead. Area E: 2 test pits excavated contain boulders and angular granite, due to lack of soil no samples were taken, No debris, stained soil, petroleum odor, or other indications of contamination were detected. Area F: 2 test pits was excavated, 1 in area were surface debris was observed (1994) A soil sample was collected and analyzed for GRO, DRO, RRO, metals, pesticides, PCBs, VOCs, and SVOCs. Arsenic was detected at 5.8 mg/kg, slightly above ADEC standards, but consistent with regional background levels. The 2nd pit contained mostly boulders of angular granite and gravel; therefore, no sample was collected. Surface debris observed included several 1 to 15 gallon containers and 35-gallon drums, steel cable, and metals associated with automotive parts or heavy machinery. 2 small drums contained residual oil, which were collected and analyzed, the sample exhibited elevated lead levels (1,950 mg/kg). A soil sample was collected from next to the containers and analyzed for GRO, DRO, RRO, PCBs, pesticides, SVOCs, and metals. This sample contained lead at 18.2 mg/kg below the ADEC cleanup level. Area G: 2 test pits were excavated, 1 in the northwest corner of the site. One soil sample was collected and analyzed for GRO, DRO, RRO, metals, pesticides, PCBs, VOCs, and SVOCs. Arsenic (7.1mg/kg) and beryllium (4.9 mg/kg) were detected within site background concentrations. The 2nd pit was excavated along the southern edge. The test pit was comprised mainly of boulders and angular granite; therefore, no sample was collected. No fuel odor was detected at either test pit. Anna Iverson
6/6/2014 Update or Other Action 2011 Decision Document- Area E: No indications of fuel contaminants were observed during test pitting, therefore, the site requires no further action under state law and will be designated Cleanup Complete. Area F: Soil sample results revealed DRO and RRO concentrations to be below the ADEC criteria (Lower Camp 250 mg/kg and 10,000 mg/kg, respectively). Because no fuel or hazardous substances were found at concentrations above applicable cleanup levels, the site requires no further action under state law and will be designated Cleanup Complete. However, surface debris was observed. Due to the observation of debris and the potential existence of subsurface solid waste, ICs will be put in place at Area F. Removal of solid waste at the site would cost an estimated $10 million and is not warranted. ICs will be put in place to document the location and boundaries of the disposal site and limit future activities that could expose buried wastes or cause the potential spread of contaminants, or placement of solid waste in environmentally sensitive areas. Area G: No indications of fuel contaminants were observed during test pitting and soil sampling did not detect DRO or RRO above the ADEC criteria (250 mg/kg and 10,000 mg/kg, respectively). Therefore, the site requires no further action under state law and will be designated Cleanup Complete. Anna Iverson
6/12/2014 Exposure Tracking Model Ranking Initial ranking with ETM completed for source area id: 79051 name: Granite Mountain AFS DA020. All pathways are incomplete or De Minimis. Anna Iverson
7/22/2014 Cleanup Complete Determination Issued The Granite Mountain Decision Document applies institutional controls to this site, restricting excavation or movement of solid waste. ICs are documented in the 611th CES Land Use Control Management Plan. The Decision Document was approved by DEC on January 10, 2011. Eric Breitenberger
7/22/2014 Institutional Control Record Established Institutional Controls established and entered into the database. Eric Breitenberger
5/18/2023 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC provided comments for the Draft Final Work Plan, Long Term Management at Granite Mountain Radio Relay Station, Alaska Dated May 2023. The Work Plan presents the approach and procedures for long-term management (LTM) at the Granite Mountain Radio Relay Station. The purpose of the LTM project is to conduct institutional control (IC) inspections, a landfill cover inspection at Site OT001, and sign maintenance, as needed, for the following sites to maintain compliance with U.S. Air Force (USAF) and regulatory requirements: DA020, DA021, DP009, DP010, LF002, OT001, SS016, SS017 and SS019. Dennis Shepard
8/15/2023 Document, Report, or Work plan Review - other DEC provided approval for the Final Work Plan, Long Term Management at Granite Mountain Radio Relay Station, Alaska Dated June 2023. The work plan presents the approach and procedures for long-term management (LTM) at the Granite Mountain Radio Relay Station. The purpose of this LTM project is to conduct institutional control (IC) inspections, a landfill cover inspection at Site OT001, and sign maintenance, as needed, for the following sites to maintain compliance with U.S. Air Force (USAF) and regulatory requirements: DA020, DA021, DP009, DP010, LF002, OT001, SS016, SS017 and SS019. Dennis Shepard
3/19/2024 Institutional Control Update DNR-SAIL added as affiliate (Office of Primary Responsibility). Jennifer McGrath

Contaminant Information

Name Level Description Media Comments
DRO < Method 2 Most Stringent Soil

Control Type

Type Details
Institutional Control Management Plan Included in 611th CES LUC Management Plan.

Requirements

Description Details
Advance approval required to transport soil or groundwater off-site.
Excavation / Soil Movement Restrictions Restrictions on excavation or disturbance of buried solid waste to prevent the release of potential contamination or placement of solid waste in environmentally sensitive areas. Restrictions on movement of buried solid waste without prior ADEC approval.

There are no documents for this site report.

No associated sites were found.

Missing Location Data

Because the GIS location data for this site has not been entered, we cannot direct you to its position on the map. Click "Continue" to proceed to the Contaminated Sites Web Map or "Close" to return to the site report.
Continue     Close